Decisions of Administrative or Quasi-Judical Agencies - False,Untrue and Misleading Advertisement-2005

1. Cosminergy Hitech Developing Co., Ltd. made false advertisement of “Cosminergy Water Treatment” and violated the Fair Trade Law ^2006/08/24
2. Huang Hsian Construction Co., Ltd. made false and misleading representation in advertisement of “Huang Hsian Vienna” pre-sale houses and violated the Fair Trade Law ^2006/08/24
3. Hsian Chan Construction Co., Ltd. made false advertisement in selling “Lung Men Ching Tian” pre-sale houses and violated Article 21 of the Fair Trade Law ^2006/08/24
4. An ex officio investigation of announcement made by Triko Foods Co., Ltd. for any violation of the Fair Trade Law ^2006/08/24
5. Merry Spa Beauty Enterprise Co., Ltd. published exaggerated and false “Merry Spa” advertisement, a violation of Article 21 of the Fair Trade Law ^2006/08/24
6. Yung Fu Development Co., Ltd. violated the Fair Trade Law for false advertising of pre-sale houses ^2006/08/24
7. A complaint filed against PChome Online Inc. for publishing “Japanese-component Rattler 2004 Ultra” radar detector advertisement on PChome Online Purchase, the advertisement is false and violates Article 21 of the Fair Trade Law ^2006/08/11
8. Bodywave Co., Ltd.’s “Red Wine Yeast Series” advertisement (Celebrity Interview, which had opinions and experiences, regarding the product in question, given by people other than the Respondent) published in magazines had false, untrue and misleading representations about the product quality, in violation of Article 21(1) of the Fair Trade Law ^2006/08/11
9. FTC initialed an investigation, ex officio, regarding DOTCOM TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD’s untrue online advertisement, which might violate Article 21 of the Fair Trade Law ^2006/03/31
10. A complaint filed against Tsann Kuen Enterprise Co., Ltd. for making false advertisement of its ViewSonic flat square CRT displays products and violating Article 21, Paragraph 1 of the Fair Trade Law ^2006/08/11
11. Long Fong Co., Ltd. made false and misleading representations of its Classic Teddy children’s apparels through ways of making it known to the public and violated Article 21 of the Fair Trade Law^2006/03/31
12. A complaint was filed against ABN AMRO Bank’s advertisements of “Top-up Program” and “Ling Yong Chin B Program” for violating the Fair Trade Law^2006/03/31
13. Shen Chun International Marketing Co., Ltd. sold product “Restore Beauty EFG” and broadcasted false “Yuan Chi Feng Po” advertisement on television channel, thus violated Article 21 of the Fair Trade Law^2006/03/31
14. Hsin Hsiang Shih Cheng Company Limited violates the Fair Trade Law^2005/10/22
15. The advertisement “Hsin Ti Lai Heng No. 61 Pao Tsuan Hsin Ti” building of Chu Ta Construction Ltd. Inc., is false and sufficient to adversely affect trading order, in violation of Fair Trade Law^2005/10/22
16. A complaint is filed against China Development Business Inc., for copying the business symbol of another party and for false advertisement, acts which violated the Article 20 and Article 21 of the Fair Trade Law.M^2005/10/18
    
17. A complaint is filed against Pingtung Fu An Drugstore for false advertisement^2005/10/18
18. President Chain Store Corporation made false advertisement in the Buy 3 Get 1 Free promotion of Cha Li Wang Product, a violation of Article 21 of the Fair Trade Law^2005/10/18
19. A complaint against Kuo Tung Gas Station Co., for the announcement of NTD 3 per liter price reduction at gasoline station which is inconsistent with the fact, a suspicious violation of the Fair Trade Law^2005/10/18
20. The advertisement “Tai Yu Chien” Credit Card Easy Loan Program of Cathay United Bank allegedly violated the Fair Trade Law^2005/10/18
21. Yuan Fu Development Co., Ltd. was suspected of violating the Fair Trade Law for making false and misleading representation regarding the mezzanine design when selling its pre-sold units and for requiring customers to pay deposits prior to the provision of contracts2005/02/24
    
22. Chu Ta Construction Co., Ltd. was suspected of violating the Fair Trade Law for selling their pre-sold units, “Hsin Ti Lai Heng No. 69 Chi Tsuan Hsin Ti”2005/02/24
    
23. The Fair Trade Commission initiated an investigation on Eastern Home Shopping Network for its exaggerated and false “Sort Patch” advertisement2005/01/27
    
24. The advertisement “Challenging Venus Ultrasonic Fat Removing Massager” by Yu-Hsin Biotechnology Co. Ltd and Eastern Home Shopping Company broadcasted on the cable television channel was exaggerated and false, in violation of the Fair Trade Law2005/01/27
    
25. PChome Online Inc. and Tsao Chee Co. Ltd. made false representation in the “Mutso Yaotiao Patch”, “Chutso Yuanchi Patch” and “Tanghsintzu Feet Patch” advertisements published on the Internet, a violation of Article 21 of the Fair Trade Law2005/01/27
    
26. PChome Online Inc. and LISAN International Co. Ltd., made false representation in the “Amazing Abs Shaper” advertisement published on the Internet, a violation of Article 21 of the Fair Trade Law2005/01/27
    

[Browse by APEC Member Economies] [Browse by Subject Categories]
[2007] [2006] [2004] [2003] [2002] [2001] [2000] [1999] [1998] [1997] [1996] [1995] [1994] [1993][1992]