apec1.gif (1822 bytes)Decisions of Administrative or Quasi-judical Agencies - 1997

  1. Violation of the Fair Trade Law by 3M Taiwan Ltd. for Colluding with Its Distributors in Setting Resale Prices
  2. New Zealand Milk Products (Far East) Ltd. Taiwan, violated the Fair Trade Law for its terminating the supply of goods
  3. Chwen Chin Professional Baseball Co., Ltd. and five other professional baseball companies were complained for their concerted action by agreement to limit activities related to the teams' operations; using a life time contract to impose improper restrictions of players' freedom to change teams
  4. Complaint Against Monopoly by Shih Hsin Broadcast System Co., Ltd
  5. The Commissary Goods Supply Administration of Ministry of National Defense violated the Fair Trade Law for causing unfair competition by careless identity checks
  6. China Maritime Corp. was investigated if its renewal of the lease of Piers No. 65 and 66 from the Kaohsiung Harbor Bureau engaged in any differential treatment
  7. A complaint was filed against CitiBank alleging that the contents of its “ Off to Macao Promotion” advertisements were false and untrue
  8. The Consumer Cooperative in Jenteh Hsiang, Tainan County, and the United Consumers' Cooperative in Tainan County together with other consumer cooperatives of a similar nature violated the Fair Trade Law for non-members exempt from the member requirements of free entrance to the cooperatives
  9. Department of Health within the Taiwan Provincial Government was reported to have violated the Fair Trade Law in its procurement of the second-phase OA office facilities through competitive bidding
  10. A group of duck egg merchants violated the Fair Trade Law for their concerted action in monopolizing the market
  11. The Environmental Protection Administration (EPA) was complained for adding new qualifications on the bidder's nationality for constructing garbage recycling plants in Pingtung and other areas
  12. "Gin Ban Shen Super Star Square" of Han Hsiang Co., Ltd. changed its floor plan which violated the Fair Trade Law
  13. The Provincial Gas Station Association violated the Fair Trade Law for the collusive bidding procedures on its "Private Gas Station Use Cash Registers Capable of Issuing Duplicate Receipts"
  14. Adjustment in the price of domestic liquid gas led to an overall hike in the retail price of containerized gas
  15. Marketing (Taiwan) Ltd. was complained for disseminating untrue information in seminars recruiting its club members in violation of Article 24 of the Fair Trade Law
  16. Pan German Motors Ltd. was complained for its false advertising about the car installments at the 0% interest rate in violation of Article 21 of the Fair Trade Law
  17. Yuan Shang Construction Co., Ltd. violated the Fair Trade Law for false advertising of the Golden Chicken Plaza Shih Lin Night Market project
  18. Golf-Course Operators Federation was complained for violation of the Fair Trade Law for setting uniform fees and discounts of fee charges during a Board Directors' and Supervisors' Plenery Meeting and Joint Session of Golf Course Operators
  19. Complaint filed by Guinness Publishing Co. against Guins Enterprise (hereinafter referred to as "Guins") alleging that Guins may violate the Fair Trade Law by using the "GUINNESS" name
  20. Han-yang Handicraft enterprise was complained for unduly selling raw materials for household processing under the guise of soliciting household contracts in violation of the Fair Trade Law
  21. The Taiwan branch of Holiday Marketing International Co., Ltd. violated the Fair Trade Law for selling membership for holiday villas
  22. Complaints alleging a concerted action taken by asphalt concrete businesses in the Ilan area
  23. Violation Of the Fair Trade Law by Joy Communication Co., Ltd. for its substantial price-increase of single-song tapes to force tie-in purchase of set tapes
  24. Ju Sheng International Limited Co. violated Article 3 (1) of the Supervisory Regulation of Multi-level Sales
  25. A practicing lawyer refused to produce relevant materials within the time limit prescribed by the Commission without due cause, constituting a violation of the provisions of Article 43 of the Fair Trade Law
  26. Jardine Schindler Lifts Limited violated the Fair Trade Law for refusing to provide repair and maintenance services
  27. Application for merger approval pursuant to Article 11 of the Fair Trade Law by Lockheed Martin Corporation and NGC Grumman Corporation (both are U.S. companies representing their Groups)
  28. N.V. Nutricia (Taiwan) Ltd., Co. violated the Fair Trade Law for its misuse of the two Chinese characters (mien-min in English transliteration, literally free-allergy) as a symbol of the product
  29. A complaint was filed by citizens of Tainan City against Yohwa Co., Ltd., an agent of Carotani sheep milk powder for babies, for alleged monopoly as indicated by the exorbitant selling prices for the sheep milk powder it distributes and by the uniform selling prices charged by all distributors
  30. Taiwan Regional Association of Dairy Processors was complained in violation of the Fair Trade Law
  31. Complaint filed against bid rigging and illegal bid collusion in connection with bidding procedures for the T'u Ch'eng Line CD267A of the Taipei Department of Rapid Transit Systems
  32. Mei T'ing Feng Co., Ltd. was complained for false advertising in violation of the Fair Trade Law
  33. Nan Shan Co., Ltd. [hereinafter referred to as "Nan Shan Company"] complained that Meng Chieh Development Company ["Meng Chieh Company"] and En Ping Co., Ltd. (from Hong Kong) ["En Ping Company"] violated the Fair Trade Law by counterfeiting and selling Capsela, a product of which the complainant was the exclusive agent
  34. A complaint was filed against Pacific Rehouse Co, Ltd. for its false advertising on the transaction price
  35. PAT NBK Co., Ltd. violated the Fair Trade Law for its obviously unfair act regarding the appearance of its products
  36. Peter Luger Company of the United Sates complained that the Hung Fang Tingchi Steak Restaurant used the name Peter Lugar, which was in violation of the Fair Trade Law
  37. The Chinese Petroleum Corporation [hereinafter referred to as "CPC"] for setting up the rule that exempts state enterprises from submitting financial statements for review while participating in bidding in compliance with the instructions of the Ministry of Economic Affairs ["MOEA"]
  38. Chin Nung Cheng retailer violated the Fair Trade Law for selling to a few retailers the goods which were supposed to be sold in consumer cooperatives
  39. The P'ingchen wholesale warehouse of RW-Mart International Limited violated the Fair Trade Law for failing to operate in accordance with the Guidelines for Wholesale, Warehousing and Distribution in an industrial zone
  40. Shepherd King International Trade Co., Ltd. violated the Fair Trade Law for its safe product brochures and advertisements were untrue
  41. Slimex Corporation and Taiwan Area National Expressway Engineering Bureau ["the Bureau"] were complained for its bidding process for SRC version used on the section to the south of Chunghe of the Second Expressway in violation of the Fair Trade Law
  42. The Taiwan Sugar Corp. violated the Fair Trade Law for having imposed unreasonable pickup and payment terms for grain sugar buyers
  43. Requests by AT&T Taiwan Telecommunication Co., Ltd. and Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. for clarification of the legitimacy of the Digital Telephone Exchange Procurement Program developed by Chunghwa Telecommunication Co., Ltd.
  44. The Tourism Industry's Quality Assurance Association violated the Fair Trade Law by promoting the "Special Program for Upgrading the Quality of Tourism" and setting the "reference prices for tourist groups"
  45. Rules for Operation and Administration of Customs Clearance Service and establishment of Trade-Van Information Service Co., Ltd. were allegedly in violation of the Fair Trade Law
  46. The Travel Quality Promotion Project and determination of Tour Group Reference Prices by the Travel Quality Assurance Association of Chinese Taipei was subject to follow-up scrutiny regarding compliance with the Fair Trade Law
  47. Unfair competition resulting from a fraudulent prize-drawing activity of Tuntex Mar
  48. Cross complaints of violation of the Fair Trade Law by Wen Shan Cable Broadcasting System Co., Ltd. and Hsin Tang Cheng Development Co., Ltd.
  49. Complaint against Taiwan Fuji Xerox Co. for monopolistic pricing involving component parts of photocopy machines
  50. Ching Hua Eyeglasses Store violated the Fair Trade Law for false and untrue advertising
  51. Swire Coca-Cola Taiwan, Ltd. violated the Fair Trade Law for failing to provide prizes under the promotion of "Youth World Cool Point Cumulation"
  52. Chunghwa Telecom Co., LTD was complained for placing improper restrictions on bidders' qualifications in its "Notice to Bidders in the Computer Graphic System of Telecommunication Pipelines and Sporadic Point Accumulation Operations of Detailed Information"
  53. Genesis Merchandisers, Inc (GMI) violated Article 23(1) of the Fair Trade Law
  54. Taipei District Court requested the Fair Trade Commission in writing to determine whether Taiwan branch of Hang Ten Enterprise Corp. violated the Fair Trade Law for selling apparels with "HANG TEN"
  55. Kao (Taiwan) Corporation's false advertising for its prize promotion regarding its concentrated washing powder "Yi-ch'ih-ling" [meaning "one spoon works."]
  56. An application for combination of Save & Safe Company Ltd. and RT-Mart International Ltd.
  57. Tainan Commissionary Goods Supply Station of the Defense Department violated the Fair Trade Law for failing to strictly verify identification cards
  58. Tap-water supply enterprises violated the Fair Trade Law for overcharging users for connection line work
  59. Taiwan Ti Na Co., Ltd. violated the Fair Trade Law for by "Mr. Zebra's Salt Sarsaparilla"
  60. Traffic light manufacturers in Taipei was complained for violation of the Fair Trade Law by participating in the public bidding for traffic light construction project
  61. Taiwan Ready-Mixed Concrete Industry Association (TRCIA) violated Article 14 of the Fair Trade Law for reaching a consensus regarding the price of concrete sold throughout Chinese Taipei
  62. Wei Hsin International Corporation violated the Fair Trade Law and the Supervisory Regulation of Multi-level Sales
  63. Yue Shih Tsong Heng Enterprise Corp. violated the Fair Trade Law for publishing false and untrue advertisements and for counterfeiting the symbol of others
  64. Yu Cheng Co., Ltd. violated the Fair Trade Law for copying the appearance and patterns of Mei Wu Fa Co., Ltd.'s shower gel containers
  65. Giraffe International Co., Ltd. violated the Fair Trade Law and Supervisory Regulation of Multi-level Sales
  66. Ann Tai Shin Co., Ltd. [the respondent] violated the Supervisory Regulation of Multi-level Sales
  67. The Warehousing Service Center of the Export Processing Zone Administration, Ministry of Economic Affairs (MOEA) violated the Fair Trade Law
  68. The Taipei City Government Bureau of Environmental Protection violated the Fair Trade Law by conducting procurement of garbage cans
  69. Application for Combination of Bank of Overseas Chinese and Peikang Credit Cooperative of Yunlin County

  70. Taipei Securities Dealers Association's application for permission to engage in concerted actions in connection with its self-regulation rules which provide for discounted commission available only to investors whose transaction value exceeds NT$ 100 million per account on a monthly basis

  71. Rejection of the application filed by the Chinese Petroleum Corporation to combine with gas stations and "Guidelines for Rejection of Possible Newly Established Domestic Oil Refiners to Combine with Local Gas Stations Before Chinese Taipei Allows Free Importation of Petroleum Related Products"

  72. Approval for Enterprise Combination between American International Life Insurance Company (AILIC) and Delaware American Life Insurance Company (DALIC), both based in the US, and Nan Shan Life Insurance Co., Ltd. (Nan Shan)

  73. Ex Officio Investigation by the Fair Trade Commission on the Combination between the Bank of Pan Hsin and the Kaohsiung Number Five Credit Cooperative, and its failure to file an application for approval with this Commission

  74. Request by the Department of Reconstruction of the Provincial Government for the interpretation whether the Fair Trade Law is applicable to Article 17 of the Regulations Governing the Pawning Industry

  75. Reply to Ilan District Court Prosecutor's Office Regarding the Alleged Concerted Actions in the Project of Sanhsing Hsiang's Landfills and Stadium Renovation

  76. The Prosecution Administration requests for legal opinions about whether "Lung Sheng Frozen Food Co., Ltd." is a well-know corporate name to the related public

  77. Correction programs regarding real estate brokers' receipt of negotiation deposit

  78. Correcting Program to Taiwan Stock Exchange Corporation for its charging stock market information service fees

  79. Complaints against President Chain Store Co., Ltd. for its unfair contract that deprives freedom of work and refrains from competition

  80. Taiwan Joint Association of Electric Appliance Dealers sent a written request for stopping the unconscionable trading practices regarding the issuance of "reservation fee checks" and guarantee checks

[Browse by APEC Member Economies][Browse by Subject Categories] [Home]
[2011] [2010] [2009] [2008] [2007] [2006] [2005] [2004] [2003] [2002] [2001] [2000] [1999] [1998] [1996] [1995][1994] [1993][1992]