Decisions of Administrative or Quasi-judical Agencies - 1999

1. Complaint alleged Famous International Beauty Co., Ltd. violated Article 21(3) of the Fair Trade Law in its "Men Are Clueless About Women's Dreams?!" advertisement 07/09/01
2. A complaint was filled against Jenn Feng Electric Industrial Co., stating that the company mailed out letters warning against patent infringements which violated the Fair Trade Law
   
3. Unfair competition complaint against Chung Hwa Telecommunication Co., Ltd. regarding its "099" services
4. Evertrust Rehouse Co., Ltd., published false advertisements in violation of the Fair Trade Law
5. Chun Hun International Beauty Co., Ltd., published false advertisements in violation of the Fair Trade Law
6. Violation of Articles 21(1) and 24 of the Fair Trade Law by Chyuan Lien Enterprise Co., Ltd. for its use of the following names at its supply outlets and in its overall business practices: R.O.C. Cooperative Association, Civil Servant and Teacher Welfare Goods Supply Centers, etc.
7. Ch'un Hsin Financial Consulting Co., Ltd. violated the Fair Trade Law and the Supervisory Regulations of Multi-Level Sales
8. Express Success, Inc., and its Chinese Taipei branch engaged in acts of multi-level sales in violation of the Fair Trade Law and the Supervisory Regulations of Multi-Level Sales
9. Rexall Showcase International, Inc., engaged in multi-level sales in violation of the Supervisory Regulations of Multi-Level Sales
10. Investigation on the violation of the Fair Trade Law by Shun Cheng Printing Ltd., Co., upon the request of the Central Chinese Taipei Office of the Investigation Bureau, the Ministry of Justices
11. Complaint by the Taiwan Silk & Filament Weaving Industrial Association, Taiwan Knitting Industry Association Republic of China, and Taiwan Weaving Industry Association of China alleging the Taiwan Man-Made Fiber Industries Association Republic of China and Taiwan Synthetic Texturize Industry Association lowered output in a concerted action to raise prices
12. Lee Min Optical Co., Ltd. continued to restrict the resale price of its "gold double oxy" contact lens cleaning fluid in violation of Article 18 of the Fair Trade Law despite having been ordered to cease the act in a disposition made by the Fair Trade Commission, dated October 9, 1996
13. Eastern Multimedia Co., Ltd. violated the Fair Trade Law by merging with Hsin Taipei, Lien Ch'un, and Chin P'ing cable television companies without applying for the necessary approval
14. Chung Chun Industries Ltd. is alleged to have violated the Fair Trade Law by raising and setting uniform prices for petroleum products at its T'u Niu gas station during the "921" earthquake disaster period
15. SATV Enterprise Co., Ltd. was alleged to have engaged in false advertising in violation of the Fair Trade Law
16. Tong Ho Development Company Limited violated the Fair Trade Law for false advertising of its "Universal Health World Village Membership Cards"
17. The Surewell supermarket and other Ilan enterprises violated the provisions of Fair Trade Law for their concerted actions
18. Presidential Chain Store Corporation was complained for monopolizing in-store collection service of telecom related bill payment by signing exclusive contract with private telecommunications companies
19. Liberty Times violated the Fair Trade Law for improperly restricting the business activities of trading counterparts by setting and reiterating rules controlling the market order of classified advertisements
20. United Evening News Co., Ltd. and China Times Evening News Co., Ltd. violated the Fair Trade Law for boycotting a newspaper distributor for its concurrently delivering the Power News
21. Golden Communications Co., Ltd., was complained for supplying videotapes under unreasonable contract terms and at unreasonable prices
22. Ao Szu Ting Beauty Salon violated the Fair Trade Law for making false and misleading representations regarding the result of its breast enlargement program in its "Speedy SPR Breast Sculpting Plan" advertisements
23. Hung Lei Cosmetology Co., Ltd., violated the Fair Trade Law for making false and misleading representations in its advertisement about its service quality
24. Kingmate Co., Ltd. violated the Fair Trade Law for abusing its market position to improperly set its price level for small generator sets during the 921 earthquake-recovering period
25. Chin T'ai Yi Water Tank Ltd., Co. violated the Fair Trade Law for inflating its water tank prices during the 921 earthquake- recovering period
26. The sales network of Yamaha motorcycle violated the Fair Trade Law for restricting and penalizing trans-territory sales by its downstream distributing enterprises
27. Hsieh He Iron Works et al. violated the Fair Trade Law for involving an illegal bidding on a chlorination equipment project at Feng Shan Plant of Taiwan Province Tap Water Co.
28. Disposition against Ni Hui Hung KTV for inciting other KTV businesses to raise their prices
29. Chie Mao Development and Construction Co., Ltd., engaged in deceptive acts of housing sale capable of affecting trading order
30. Disposition against Wang Hsin-mou of the Lao Pai Wang Fishng Bait Company for inappropriately sending warning letters
31. Complaint filed against Pan Pacific International Marketing Co., Ltd., for allegedly violating the Fair Trade Law in its sale of membership cards for vacation resorts
32. Hualien cable television enterprises involved in merger in violation of the Fair Trade Law
33. Hsin Min Gas Safety Equipment Co., Ltd. violated the Fair Trade Law for practicing false advertising
34. Complaint alleging predatory price-setting by Chunghwa Telecom in its third rate adjustment scheme
35. Procter & Gamble Co., Ltd. was accused of using its dominant market position against downstream businesses unfairly in violation of the Fair Trade Law
36. Taiwan Automobile Co., Ltd., covertly pre-selected the contractor when calling for tenders for provision of bus seat covers. This was an obviously unfair act in violation of the Fair Trade Law
37. Yu K'un Transportation Ltd. and others violated the Fair Trade Law by acting in concert to monopolize bulk light diesel transport business contracted out by Chinese Petroleum Co., Ltd.
38. Collusive practices among bottlers in the Hsinchu and Miaoli region
39. Sixteen gas shops in Hsichih raised household bottled gas prices in concert1
40. Excessively high pricing of bottled gas in the Shetzu District of Taipei
41. A complaint that four bottled gas steel bottle inspection companies in southern Chinese Taipei-He Hsing Enterprises Ltd., Co., Jung Shun Hsing Ltd., Co., Safeway Gas Company Ltd., Co.'s Kaohsiung facility, and Ch'un An Engineering Ltd., Co.-had raised bottle inspection fees in concert in violation of the Fair Trade Law
42. Alleged violation of the Fair Trade Law by Hewlett Packard for improper sending of warning letters regarding infringement of patent rights
43. Alleged violation of the Fair Trade Law by France Bed Co., Ltd. in its representation of the scope of its "Teh Tai & Design" trademark right
44. Taiwan Cellular Corporation placed false advertisements in violation of the Fair Trade Law
45. Kingtel Telecommunication Corporation made misleading statements about product functions in its mobile phone advertisements
46. Violation of the Fair Trade Law by Hsiao Mu Chiang Teaching Material Publishing House for publishing false advertising
47. Carrefour Co. Ltd.'s labeled prices did not correspond to actual sales prices in a violation of the Fair Trade Law
48. A complaint alleging that Chia Yi Co., Ltd. used the name Pei Lian She Fu Li P'in Kung Hsiao Chan [United Northern Community PX Goods Supplier] in violation of the Fair Trade Law
49. Obviously unfair acts sufficient to affect the trading order by the Kaohsiung American English Foreign Language Review School
50. Mr. Ch'en Liang-cheng violated Fair Trade Law Article 24 with deceptive acts that influenced the trading order
51. Super Rich Food Co., Ltd., violated the Article 5(1) of the Supervisory Regulations Governing Multi-Level Sales for deducting 5% in administrative service charges from refunding the purchase price when participans withdraw from the organization and terminate the contract
    
52. Redin International Co., Ltd.’s violated Article 3(2) of the Supervisory Regulations Governing Multi-Level Sales for failing to file a report before implementing changes to its methods of calculating commission, bonus, and other economic benefits and making new additions to its product line
    
53. Ch' un Heng International Beauty Co., Ltd. violated the Fair Trade Law for publishing false advertisements
    
54. The cable broadcast system operators, Hsin Yi Huan Le, Fu Shih, Lung Ch'ih, Chn P'in Tao, and Ch'ang Te violated the Fair Trade Law for engaging in concerted action
    
55. Kwang Yang Motor Co., Ltd. violated the Fair Trade Law for its false advertisements on Filly 50/80 motorcycles
    
56. The Central Trust and the Department of Commodities Affairs violated the Fair Trade Law for its unreasonable contract provisions on international procurement for bidders
    
57. Tuntex Distinct Corp. violated the Fair Trade Law for failing to provide contract for review and the change of its original product design
    
58. Taiwan Paging Network Inc. violated the Fair Trade Law for unilaterally raising the price of the “One-Dollar Paging Services”
    
59. Ta Ting Mei Construction and Development Corp. violated the Fair Trade Law for its fasle advertisement on the “Hsinchu Town Houses”
    
60. Zue Shin Real Estate violated the Fair Trade Law for failing to fully disclose trade information, and therefore mislead its trading counterparts
    
61. Violation of the Fair Trade Law by Chin Huan Hsi International Travel Co. Ltd. for deceptive acts that are sufficient to affect trading order
    
62. Ch'ang Lin Enterprise Co., Ltd.'s use of packaging similar to that of the K'o Ch'au Ling drying agent constituted unfair competition
    
63. Chiu Ting Construction Co., Ltd.'s false advertising in violation of the Fair Trade Law
    
64. Violation of the Fair Trade Law by the rust removal of water treatment plant project at the Lin Yuan petrochemical factory of Chinese Petroleum Corporation
    
65. Management of City Bus Operations of Taipei City Government accused of improper restriction of place of origin and brands when procuring an electric lift machine
    
66. Unfair competition of Siemens Nixdorf Information Systems Ltd., Chinese Taipei Branch for abusive issue of warning letters
    
67. Professional E. E. accused of designating company and brand in a project to add second power supply circuit at Academia Sinica in violation of the Fair Trade Law
    
68. Violation of Supervisory Regulation of Multi-Level Sales by Taiwan First, Inc.
    
69. Violation of the Fair Trade Law by Ambassador Resorts Ltd. Taiwan Branch when selling resort membership for engaging in obviously unfair acts against its trading counterparts that could substantially affect trading order
    
70. Violation of the Fair Trade Law by Life International Co. for its Franchise Agreement
    
71. Violation of the Fair Trade Law by Postal Remittance and Savings Bank for raising fees to public utilities for payment of accounts through deposit account remittances
    
72. Alleged violation of the Supervisory Regulation of Multi-Level Sales by Freemaker International Co., Ltd.
    
73. False advertising by Ta Hsin Tien Min Chu Cable Television Limited Company (hereinafter "Ta Hsin Tien") concerning operator qualifications
    
74. Ta P'ing Cable Television Ltd., Co., alleges violations of the Fair Trade Law by San Li Video Co., Sheng Ch'i Co., Pa Ta International Broadcasting Co., and Ta T'un Min Chu Cable Broadcasting Systems Co.
    
75. Yung Chun Trading Limited Company Reported for Allegedly Signing Unreasonable Contracts with Franchisees of the Konica Photo Express Franchise in Violation of the Fair Trade Law
    
76. A complaint was filed against three refill and distribution companies in Hsinchu and Miaoli, Pei Yi Hsing Enterprise, Liu T'ung, and Hsin Lun, for acting in concert to raise prices of liquefied petroleum gas (LPG)
    
77. Wine-Font International Commerce Corp. allegedly disseminated or made untrue statements that were capable of damaging the business reputation of another person, which was in violation of the Fair Trade Law
    
78. A complaint was filed against Pei En Enterprise Co., stating that the company mailed out a letter warning against trademark infringement in violation of the Fair Trade Law
    
79. The Taiwan Tobacco and Wine Board [formerly the Taiwan Tobacco and Wine Monopoly Bureau] sent a letter to the Fair Trade Commission requesting the Commission to investigate alleged hoarding of rice wine by retailers in violation of the Fair Trade Law
    
80. A complaint was filed by Colden Bookstore Co. against Bookman Books, Wen Yuan, Chin Lin, and Hui Yang T’ang publishing companies and bookstores for violating the Fair Trade Law
    
81. Family Mart allegedly violated the Fair Trade Law when it held a give-away promotional campaign with maximum prize money of NT＄2 million
    
82. Lin, Po-hsien sent warning letters (attested letters registered with the post office) in violation of Article 24 of the Fair Trade Law
    
83. The bottles of the “Weilih Pure Water” sold by Weilih Corp. were copied from the bottles of “Taisun Pure Water” produced by Taisun Enterprise Corp. in violation of Article 24 of the Fair Trade Law
    
84. Mei-hwa Video Ltd. allegedly sent attested letters registered with the post office and accompanied the police on raids of bars and other operating sites in violation of the Fair Trade Law
    
85. A complaint was filed against certain cable broadcast operators in Tainan for conducting joint business operations
    
86. Congress Candidate Huang Wei-feng of Changhwa County filed a complaint against cable TV operators in Changhwa County for allegedly acting in concert in connection with election campaign commercials
    
87. The Lungyen Group allegedly violated the Fair Trade Law when selling the “Paishawan Memorial Park”
    
88. Violation of Fair Trade Law by Yi Chia Li Beauty Ltd., Co. for false advertising
    
89. Merger of Aktieselskabet Dampskibsselskabet Svendborg and Dampskibsselskebet af 1912 Aktieselskab) with Sea-Land Service Inc. 06/26/01
90. Application for merger approval for the merger between Grand Keelung CATV Co., Ltd. and Gilung CATV Co., Ltd., pursuant to Article 11 of Fair Trade Law
91. Application by the Procter & Gamble Company and Proctor & Gamble Taiwan for merger with Zhon-chen Paper Manufacturing Co., Ltd., and Yu Ma International Co., Ltd.
92. An application for merger filed by the Bank of Taiwan to acquire and quarantee all operations and assets and liabilities of the Dongang Credit Cooperative in Pingtung County
93. Application by the Taiwan Broadband Communications Co., Ltd., Preparatory Office for merger with South Taoyuan CATV Co., pursuant to Article 11 of the Fair Trade Law
94. Approval of the assignment of the primary portion of the operations of Ta Ch'eng Cable Transmission Systems Co., Ltd., to Ch'ang Te Cable Transmission Systems Co., Ltd.
95. Application for approval of combination filed by KG Telecom and Tuntex Telecom in accordance with Article 11 of the Fair Trade Law
96. Application for a combination through franchising by Taiwan McDonalds Ltd.
97. Application for companies to engage in a concerted action to lower the production volume of man-made and synthetic fiber by their respective industry associations
98. Chanlong Corporation's application to combine with Sanfu Paper Manufacturing Corporation Ltd.
99. Approval of applications filed by Yuelong Motor Co., Ltd. and Ch'un Yuan Investment Corp. for merger with Ke Shang Vehicle Rental Corp. and Hsin Ke Rental Corp.
100. Merger between China American Petrochemical Co., Ltd., and Tuntex Petrochemical Inc.
101. Request by the Bank of Taiwan for an interpretation on the compliance with the Fair Trade Law regarding its setting of a fixed price for lottery tickets in Taiwan's National Welfare Lottery
102. Request by the Public Construction Commission for an interpretation as to whether the setting of remuneration standard for members by the technician and architect associations was in violation of the Fair Trade Law
     
     

[Browse by APEC Member Economies][Browse by Subject Categories] [Home]
[2011] [2010] [2009] [2008] [2007] [2006] [2005] [2004] [2003] [2002] [2001] [2000] [1998] [1997][1996] [1995][1994] [1993][1992]