Decisions of Administrative or Quasi-judical Agencies - Other Restrictive Business Practices-2005

1. Complaints filed against Kang Hsuan, Nani, Han Lin and Jenlin textbooks publishers for restricting its trading counterparts to determine the resale prices and restraining their sales to a distribution area, in violation of the Fair Trade Law^2006/08/11
Kaohsiung Rapid Transit Corporation (“KRTC”) was accused of improperly designating four ready-mix concrete businesses and excluding other businesses from entering the market, in possible violation of Article 19 (vi) of the Fair Trade Law^2006/08/11
3. Complaints filed against Jhonghwa United Gas Filling Station of Penghu County increased the price of cylinder liquefied petroleum gas and violated the Fair Trade Law^2006/08/11
4. Four Pillars Enterprise Co. filed a complaint against Avery Dennison for using a joint venture as bait to steal its trade secrets, Avery Dennison counter-charged Four Pillars Enterprise for making and disseminating false statements that are sufficient to damage its business reputation ^2006/03/23
5. FA complaint is filed against Nichia Corporation for improperly disseminating false statement that the other enterprise has infringed its patent ^2006/03/23
6. A complaint is filed against US company AKT Inc., and US company Applied Material Co., for indiscriminately issuing warning letters, a suspicious violation of the Fair Trade Law2005/04/14
7. The public reported that the gasoline stations in the Hualien-Taitung area owned by Taiwan Sugar Corporation did not participate in the price reduction promotion held by that company might be a result of the restraint action of the local gasoline station association of the Hualien-Taitung area and was suspected to be a violation of the Fair Trade Law2005/03/17

[Browse by APEC Member Economies] [Browse by Subject Categories]
[2007] [2006] [2004] [2003] [2002] [2001] [2000] [1999] [1998] [1997] [1996] [1995] [1994] [1993][1992]