apec1.gif (1822 bytes)Decisions of Administrative or Quasi-judicial Agencies -Other Restrictive Business Practices-1997

  1. Complaint filed against bid rigging and illegal bid collusion in connection with bidding procedures for the T'u Ch'eng Line CD267A of the Taipei Department of Rapid Transit Systems
  2. A group of duck egg merchants violated the Fair Trade Law for their concerted action in monopolizing the market
  3. Complaint against Taiwan Fuji Xerox Co. for monopolistic pricing involving component parts of photocopy machines
  4. The Tourism Industry's Quality Assurance Association violated the Fair Trade Law by promoting the "Special Program for Upgrading the Quality of Tourism" and setting the "reference prices for tourist groups"
  5. Requests by AT&T Taiwan Telecommunication Co., Ltd. and Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. for clarification of the legitimacy of the Digital Telephone Exchange Procurement Program developed by Chunghwa Telecommunication Co., Ltd.
  6. China Maritime Corp. was investigated if its renewal of the lease of Piers No. 65 and 66 from the Kaohsiung Harbor Bureau engaged in any differential treatment
  7. The Provincial Gas Station Association violated the Fair Trade Law for the collusive bidding procedures on its "Private Gas Station Use Cash Registers Capable of Issuing Duplicate Receipts"
  8. Cross complaints of violation of the Fair Trade Law by Wen Shan Cable Broadcasting System Co., Ltd. and Hsin Tang Cheng Development Co., Ltd.
  9. The Chinese Petroleum Corporation [hereinafter referred to as "CPC"] for setting up the rule that exempts state enterprises from submitting financial statements for review while participating in bidding in compliance with the instructions of the Ministry of Economic Affairs ["MOEA"]
  10. The Environmental Protection Administration (EPA) was complained for adding new qualifications on the bidder's nationality for constructing garbage recycling plants in Pingtung and other areas
  11. New Zealand Milk Products (Far East) Ltd. Taiwan, violated the Fair Trade Law for its terminating the supply of goods
  12. Adjustment in the price of domestic liquid gas led to an overall hike in the retail price of containerized gas
  13. Violation Of the Fair Trade Law by Joy Communication Co., Ltd. for its substantial price-increase of single-song tapes to force tie-in purchase of set tapes
  14. The Travel Quality Promotion Project and determination of Tour Group Reference Prices by the Travel Quality Assurance Association of Chinese Taipei was subject to follow-up scrutiny regarding compliance with the Fair Trade Law
  15. The Warehousing Service Center of the Export Processing Zone Administration, Ministry of Economic Affairs (MOEA) violated the Fair Trade Law
  16. Chunghwa Telecom Co., LTD was complained for placing improper restrictions on bidders' qualifications in its "Notice to Bidders in the Computer Graphic System of Telecommunication Pipelines and Sporadic Point Accumulation Operations of Detailed Information"
  17. Taipei District Court requested the Fair Trade Commission in writing to determine whether Taiwan branch of Hang Ten Enterprise Corp. violated the Fair Trade Law for selling apparels with "HANG TEN"

[Browse by APEC Member Economies] [Browse by Subject Categories] [Home]