APEC /PFP Training Program on Competition Policy
Report of the Fifth Meeting


A. Participants
Under the framework of the "PFP" (Partners for Progress) initiative in APEC, the Japan Fair Trade Commission and the Thai Department of Internal Trade have implemented a five-year training program on competition policy since the fiscal year 1996.
The fifth meeting was held in Bangkok on 13-15 March this year and more than 50 experts participated in the meeting from 20 APEC economies. They were mainly composed of middle level officials of competition agencies, but some academics and business people familiar with competition law also participated. Indeed, OECD and UNCTAD have dispatched their experts to the meeting.

B. Program
At the fifth meeting, an importance was given to its small group sessions like as the last meeting. This was the second time to introduce small group sessions in this PFP program, aiming at more in-depth analyses and interactive discussion on particular topics. Regarding its contents, please refer to the ANNEX 1. Since most of the APEC member economies have adopted a national competition law last five years, topics to be discussed in the meeting have changed year after year from the fundamental issues on competition law into the operational aspects of the law. Please find ANNEX 2 with regard to the themes of the last five meetings. This year's themes are following:
Small group 1: Enhancing skills to detect cartels and to regulate mergers
Small group 2: Ensuring compliance and cooperation in competition law enforcement
Small group 3: Promoting competition in regulated sectors or public sectors

C. Results
In small group sessions, most participants made brief presentation including some cases. Thanks to active contribution of all participants and well organizing of the moderators, it was broadly found that the discussion was active and fruitful.

In small group 1, attendants discussed the following three points.
(1) Detection, Investigation and Prosecution of cartels (e.g. The problems as to how to prove cartel, Does corporate leniency program play institutional role in the detection of international cartel activity?)
(2) Mergers to be estimated illegal according to the antimonopoly act (e.g. what sort of factors should be considered as criteria?)
(3) The objective and characteristics of antimonopoly act (e.g. how to understand the concept such as free competition, fair competition and equal competition)

In small group 2,
(1) Actual case of antimonopoly act compliance program (e.g. the importance of administrative guidance, open the direct telephone line for receiving complaints)
(2) The problems in competition law enforcement (e.g. shortage of firms and consumers' recognition for competition law, shortage of staff in competition law enforcement)
(3) The actions taken for industry and consumers in order to deepen their recognition about the benefits given by competition law

In small group 3,
(1) how to promote competition in regulated sectors (e.g. divide the electric company into generating company and distributing company, privatization in order to enhance cost efficiency)
(2) reform of the competition and regulatory authorities and importance of the transparent decision making processes of those authorities

At the last day of the meeting, we delivered questionnaire to all attendants and it seemed that almost all of participants evaluated the meeting favorably. Main opinions are following :

This was the last meeting held under the framework of the PFP but the JFTC fully recognizes its importance and would like to consult with the relevant agencies and make efforts to seek ways for its further development. Continued effort shall be made for APEC members' capacity building from now on.