Regulatory Reform In Korea
��
��
- Regulations work to protect consumers and the environment, deter fraud and waste, ensure market stability and vitality.
- But can also stifle competition increase costs to business and consumers, inflate government budgets, decrease government efficiency, create opportunities for corruption.
��
- 1970s
- Very restricted market; government maintained control over economic activity; capitalized on cheap labor to push exports.
- Government direct expansion, such as creation of new industries; for example, under President Park Shipbuilding industry stated: Hyundai shipbuilding evolution from 10,000 tons displacement to 250,000 ton supertankers overnight; soon after law enacted that all imported oil must arrive in Korea-built ship.
- Close ties between government, banks and chaebol; preferential treatment from government allowed chaebol expansion.
- Foreign investment opportunities extremely limited; JVs one of the few avenues of investment.
- 1980s
- Still a tightly controlled market.
- Chaebol expanding into many different business sectors; beginning to gain international prestige.
- Chaebol controlled most aspects of economy; for example, sales of top 10 chaebol in 1974 represented over 15% of GDP, in 1984, it was over 67% of GDP; the sales at the top 3 in 1984 represented over 35% of GDP.
- Late 1980s
- Government began to loosen grip on the economy; GDP growth increased to over 11% 1986-1988.
- Labor unrest started; wealth of chaebol and strength of economy spurred union activity & workers' demands.
- Still averse to foreign investment;
��
��Procedural processes for Foreign Investors (1985)
Nation
No. Of Documents
No. Of Procedures
No. Of workdays
Korea
312
64
1005
Japan
325
46
492
Taiwan
238
20
175
US
23
9
175
��
- Kim YS took office 1992; government began "globalization" effort; speed and scope of liberalization matters of great debate.
- Restricted and prohibited business lines sealed back:
1988 - 162 restricted (i.e. partially opened) industries
56 prohibited industries
1996 - 74 restricted industries
32 prohibited industries
- "Globalization" focused on Korean companies investing abroad, less so on open market for foreign investors; chaebol expand business lines and increase investments.
- Hyundai cars into the U.S. market.
- Daewoo in eastern Europe and other regions.
��
�� | Inward Investment |
Outward Investment |
($US million) |
1994 |
1,317 |
3,581 |
�� |
1995 |
1,941 |
4,946 |
�� |
1996 |
3,203 |
6,218 |
�� |
��
��
- Problems at Home
- Chaebol grabbed any opportunity when possible; otherwise, might not be available in the future �� consequence of tight government control
- Restricted market access led to oligopolistic business environment; intense competition between power-holders in which market share was prime goal, not profitability.
- Legal mechanisms to deal with bankruptcy not efficient; government unwilling to let companies die; for example, Kia and Hanbo still exporting today.
- Lack of small and medium sized businesses, except for chaebol suppliers.
- Bank-government-chaebol collusion caused irrational credit allocation; too much emphasis to debt-it's easier to control �� than equity; chaebol highly leveraged; over-capacity evident in many industries.
- Protected financial markets; banks and other financial institutions lacking risk analysis techniques and access to necessary financial information.
- Problems Abroad: investor confidence weakened throughout Southeast Asia; Indonesia and Thailand faced financial disaster; currency devaluations pressured Korean won.
- Korea the Next to Fall: attention turned to Korea and inherent, market problems; run on currency in November and near financial collapse; lack of international confidence in Korean financial system.
��
- Asked for international support for rollover of short term debt in exchange for reforming financial regulatory system.
- Support from IMP, World Bank and trading partners; adopted IMF program.
- Stopped spending to defend currency; began to disclose the scope of financial problems.
- Established the Financial Supervisory commission and defined its relationship with MOFE and newly independent BOK.
- International government bond offering a huge success; more demand, than supply.
- Began self criticism: what are the fundamental problems? How can Korea improve?
- Realization that regulatory environment had to be improved; more business friendly.
- Realization that foreign capital and foreign participation vital parts of successful economies.
- Over last six years, Korea had lowest level of FDI compared to total fixed capital of any developing nation at 0.9%, Singapore 25.4%, China 13%, Mexico 11.9%, Taiwan 3.5%.
��
- Kim Dae Jung wins election; basically running government after election/before inauguration; liberalization sped up as reaction to weakened economy; attracting foreign investment now a policy priority.
- Major areas of reform
- Trade and Capital Accounts bond market liberalized; open market for commercial papers, commercial bills and trade bills.
- Corporate Governance: restrictions on hostile M&A relaxed; consolidated financial statements required by 1999; cross financing between chaebol affiliates restricted.
- Labor: formation of tripartite commission for labor market reform; layoffs permitted for restructuring of companies in financial difficulty; government announced provision of US$5.6 billion to provide social safety not for unemployed.
- Real Estate: restrictions on purchase of land by non-Koreans eliminated; taxed on sales of real estate reduced.
- Progress of Liberalization: two examples
- Example �� Telecommunications
1998 �� Prohibited to foreign participation
1996 - Foreign investment limited to 33% foreign ownership in
wireless services and no ownership in wire based services
1998 - Foreign investment in wireless and wire based services limited to
33%; 20% ceiling on foreign ownership of Korea Telecom
1999 - Foreign investment limit in wireless and wire based services
increases to 49%
2001 - Foreign ownership limit in Korea Telecom raises to 33%
- Example �� Stock Market
Pre 1992 �� Stock Market closed to foreign investors
1992 �� 10% total foreign investment ceiling per issue and 3% individual
holding ceiling per issue
1996 �� 18% total foreign investment ceiling per issue and 4% individual
holding ceiling per issue
1998 �� Ceiling raised incrementally over first four months: removed
completely in May, except for government controlled companies
��
- Currency stabilized; confidence returning, albeit slowly.
- Financial system working; restructuring underway: problems (weak banks, accounting standards, etc) being addressed, but will take time.
- Significant foreign investments by Coca-Cola, Volco, P&G, BASF and AES; more on the way: in 1997, inward investment (US$6.9 billion) greater than outward (US$5.8 billion).
- Push towards liberalization and market reform; barring major setbacks, will have more equitable and business friendly environment in the future.