Decisions of Administrative or Quasi-judical Agencies - Other Deceptive or Obviously Unfair Conducts-2024

1. Youxuan Enterprise violated Article 25 of Fair Trade Act by adopting deceptive and obviously unfair practices to market beauty products^2025/12/02
2. Ether Gifts violated the Fair Trade Act by improperly using business names” Liang Yeou” and “Liang Yun” of its competitors in its keyword advertisements, an unfair act that exploited the efforts of others and was able to affect trading order^2025/12/02
3. Sheng Xi Construction violated the Fair Trade Act by posting false advertisements to market Sheng Mei Garden housing project^2025/12/02
4. Zhuo Xing Ltd. posting false advertisements to market a “Class A cooling technology supple skin-caressing blanket” in violation of Fair Trade Act^2025/12/02
5. Process taken by New Taipei Construction, Hong Pu Real Estate Development and Hai Xin International violated the Fair Trade Law by marketing Hong Pu Central Park presale homes^2025/01/20
6. Force MOS Technology violated the Fair Trade Law by sending warning letters when its US patent was invalid^2025/01/20
7. Booking.com violated the Fair Trade Law by using the name of another enterprise to produce a keyword advertisement^2025/01/20
8. Ace Diamonds violated the Fair Trade Law by illegitimately using the business symbols of “AMC Diamonds” and “AMC Diamond Rings” of its competitor to product keyword advertisements^2025/01/20

[Browse by APEC Member Economies] [Browse by Subject Categories] [Home]