Decisions of Administrative or Quasi-Judicial Agencies - Decisions -False,Untrue and Misleading Advertisement-2015

1. Chunghwa Telecom violated the Fair Trade Law for posting false comparative ads regarding charges for “100M Internet Access Speed + TV Channels” ^2016/01/30
2. IEZ Mall Co. Ltd. violated the Fair Trade Law for its TV commercial of “Bing Li mobile water-cooling AC” ^2016/01/30
3. Han Xiang Development violated the Fair Trade Law for posting false advertisements of “Xin Jie Du” presale home project ^2016/01/30
4. Jayshelyn Construction violated of the Fair Trade Law by posting false advertisements for the “Jayshelyn Shui Li Fang” housing project ^2016/01/30
5. Family Spa violated the Fair Trade Law for posting false advertisements claiming itself as “the largest manufacturer and wholesaler in the country” and “having in business for 20 years” ^2016/01/30
6. LG Electronics Taiwan Taipei Co., Ltd. violated the Fair Trade Law for falsely advertising its upright inverter washing machines as passing “Energy Label Certification” on its company website  ^2016/10/04
7. Nanyuan Construction violated the Fair Trade Law for posting a false advertisement on “West Lake Impression” housing project  ^2016/10/04
8. Ontech Corp., ERA Communications, GOMAJI, Contact Digital Integration and Groupon Taiwan violated the Fair Trade Law by posting false advertisements  ^2016/10/04
9. Momo.com Inc. and Super Link Global violated the Fair Trade Law by posting false advertisements when marketing “Super Model Wardrobe medium and large size blouse sets with retro patterns”  ^2016/10/04
10. Charng Shun Trading violated the Fair Trade Law for posting false advertisements when marketing the “Alstrong hex bolt extractor L wrench set”  ^2016/10/04

[Browse by APEC Member Economies] [Browse by Subject Categories] [Home]