Decisions of Administrative or Quasi-Judicial Agencies - Decisions -False,Untrue and Misleading Advertisement-2014

1. Pa Star Technology Co. violated the Fair Trade Law by posting a false advertisement for ZANWA refrigerators on several shopping websites ^2015/03/17
2. Avon Cosmetics Taiwan Ltd. violated the Fair Trade Law by posting a false advertisement for its water purifier ^2015/03/17
3. New Vision Co., Ltd. violated the Fair Trade Law by concealing important trading information when recruiting franchisees for "HealthCom Medical Supply" stores ^2015/03/17
4. Kwong Lung Enterprise Co., Ltd. violated the Fair Trade Law by posting a false advertisement claiming that it is the "exclusive manufacturing of feather bedding and pillows for department store brands" ^2015/03/17
5. Yuelao International Information Network Co., Ltd. violated the Fair Trade Law by posting a comparative advertisement on its website ^2015/03/17
6. Shiyun Motor Co. violated the Fair Trade Law by posting false and untrue advertisement for its used cars ^2015/03/17
7. Skinfood Co., Ltd. violated the Fair Trade Law by posting a false advertisement and failing to fully disclose franchising information ^2015/03/17
8. Proudly Construction violated the Fair Trade Law for its “Li Chi Xiang Xie” housing project advertisements ^2015/09/30
9. Eastern Home Shopping & Leisure, Li Jie International and Fubon Multimedia Technology violated the Fair Trade Law for false advertising^2015/09/30
10. Yulon Nissan Motor violated the Fair Trade Law by posting false advertisements for Nissan Sentra ^2015/09/30
11. Ming Jie Construction violating Fair Trade Law for posting false advertisements for its “Shou Yao” housing project^2015/09/30
12. Cite Publishing violated the Fair Trade Law by posting false TV audience ratings^2015/09/30

[Browse by APEC Member Economies] [Browse by Subject Categories] [Home]