apec1.gif (1822 bytes)Decisions of Administrative or Quasi-Judicial Agencies - Decisions -False,Untrue and Misleading Advertisement-2009

  1. Las Vegas Co. violated Article 21 of the Fair Trade Law by making false advertisements while hosting "2009 World Circus and Children's Folk game Fair"
  2. PresiCarre Co., Ltd. and Carrefour Taiwan Co. Ltd. violated the Fair Trade Law by posting the untrue advertisement of "get discount coupons of NT$7,200 when spending up to NT$3,600 with consumer vouchers"
  3. Asia Pacific Telecom Co. Ltd. violated the Fair Trade Law by conducting in an untrue fee comparison and promotions advertisement on "Happy 888" package"
  4. Taiwan Hitachi Co., Ltd. violated Article 21 of the Fair Trade Law by publishing untrue advertisement
  5. Kuo Yang Construction Co., Ltd. violated the Fair Trade Law by posting untrue advertisement for the construction project of Southern California (Tahiti Ocean View District)
  6. Chiwe Industrial Co., Ltd. violated the Fair Trade Law by posting untrue advertisement about its product, "Magical Environmental Protection and Efficient Laundry Balls"
  7. Yahoo! Taiwan Holdings Limited, Taiwan Branch (H.K.) violated Article 21 of the Fair Trade Law by claiming to be the "largest used vehicles market in Taiwan" on its YAHOO! Kimo auction website
  8. Martinlee International Co., Ltd. violated Article 21(1) of the Fair Trade Law by publishing untrue online advertisement of its products

[Browse by APEC Member Economies] [Browse by Subject Categories] [Home]