Decisions of Administrative or Quasi-judicial Agencies - Other Restrictive Business Practices-2006

1. Complaint against Yung Chi Paint & Varnish Mfg. Co., Ltd. for making false representation on the passive fire protection material "Huo Pa F-100" and its advertisement, in violation of the Fair Trade Law
2. C.K.S International Airport adopted differential treatment of restricting the bidder's qualification without justification in the property rental tender of "The Placement of Commercial Advertising at Terminal 1 and Terminal 2"
3. Chinese Educational Development and Cooperation Association (CEDCA) disseminated fliers "BELI is not equivalent to the Language Center of University of California, Berkeley" and "Don't Forget Your Rights and Interests", and violated Article 19, Subparagraph 3, Article 22 and Article 24 of the Fair Trade Law
4. A complaint filed against the American Genesis Microchip Corporation for improperly disseminating false accusation letters that affect the business reputation of another and may have violated the Fair Trade Law
5. The ex officio investigations of Taichung County Lunchbox Association's collection of security deposits from its members to prevent its members from price war, and violated the Fair Trade Law
6. Fair Trade Commission initiated an ex officio investigation on Concord Consolidated Securities Co., Ltd. and Concord Futures Co., Ltd.'s giveaway event "Wow! House Giveaway," a possible violation of the Fair Trade Law
7. Taiwan Tobacco & Liquor Corporation violated the Fair Trade Law by improperly restraining trading counterparts to purchase bestseller tobacco products during the imbalance between market demand and supply

[Browse by APEC Member Economies] [Browse by Subject Categories] [Home]