Decisions of Administrative or Quasi-Judicial Agencies - False,Untrue and Misleading Advertisement-2006

1. Taipei Fubon Bank Co., Ltd. made false and misleading representation in its advertisement of New Taiwan Dollar certificate of deposit and published the said advertisement in the relevant newspaper and magazines, a violation of Article 21, Paragraph 1 of the Fair Trade Law applied mutatis mutandis to Paragraph 3
2. Chu Ho Fa Construction Co., Ltd. violated Article 21 of the Fair Trade Law in its "Ti Ching Villa" pre-sale house advertisement
3. The American World Gym Fitness Co., Ltd. made false and misleading representation in its service content when soliciting for new members, a violation of Article 21 of the Fair Trade Law
4. A complaint filed against Far Eastern Electronic Toll Collection Co., Ltd. for making false ETC advertisement on television, the information was not completely disclosed and asymmetric, and violated the Fair Trade La
5. Save and Safe Tech. Co., Ltd. made false and misleading representation as to the value of air ticket prize in the advertisement of lucky draw and violated Article 21, Paragraph 1 of the Fair Trade Law
   
6. A complaint filed against NTUDOCTOR Co, Ltd. for publishing "the nation's largest tutoring network", "NTUDOCTOR Tutoring Center is the nation's largest tutoring web" on the webpage, exploiting the metatag function of website design, and improperly using the "104" symbol of 104 Corporation, a violation of the Fair Trade Law
7. A complaint filed against Jung Shing International Co., Ltd. for making false advertisement of debt coordination, violated Article 21 and Article 24 of the Fair Trade Law
8. Executive Yuan forwarded letters stating that Chanson Sporting Goods Co., Ltd. and Presicarre Corp. violated Article 21 of the Fair Trade Law by publishing untrue advertisement regarding their product "CS-100 Silver Shark Massage Beetle"
9. Ford Distribution Taiwan Ltd. violated Article 21 of the Fair Trade Law by employing untrue website advertisement and product catalogs referring to the televised video “NCAP crash test gave 4 star rating” for marketing Mazda6 motor vehicles"
10. Feifan Marketing Enterprise violated Article 21 of the Fair Trade Law by publishing untrue loan advertisement
11. The advertisement of "Korea Sanitizing/Fruits & Vegetables Purifying Cabinet" published on Kof World's website violated the Fair Trade Law by containing exaggerated and untrue statements
12. Guei Ting International Fashion Garment Ltd. violated the Fair Trade Law by making false, untrue and misleading representations on the website regarding the origin of its brand "NATURALLY JOJO"
13. The sales prices of CASIO digital cameras sold on PC Home's website was complained by the public to be untrue and constitute a violation of the Fair Trade Law
14. Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. was complained for violating the Fair Trade Law by externally disseminating false, untrue and misleading advertisement
15. DAAI Detective Co., Ltd. violated Article 21 of the Fair Trade Law by publishing exaggerated and untrue advertisement on the website
16. An ex officio investigation initiated by Fair Trade Commission into VIVA TV Shopping Channel's untrue advertisement of "Electricity Saving Warrior" in violation of Article 21 of the Fair Trade Law
17. An ex officio investigation initiated by Fair Trade Commission into the untrue advertisement of "SNOOPY 55th Anniversary Memorial Cellular Phones" violated Article 21 of the Fair Trade Law
18. Taiwan 24hrs Electronic Information Co., Ltd. violated the Fair Trade Law by employing untrue advertisement
19. Wyeth Pharmaceuticals (Asia) violated Article 21 of the Fair Trade Law by employing untrue advertisement to sell "S-26 Gold Formula"
20. Holy Stone Enterprise Co., Ltd. violated Article 21(1) of the Fair Trade Law by publishing untrue advertisement
    

[Browse by APEC Member Economies] [Browse by Subject Categories] [Home]