Decisions of Administrative or Quasi-judicial
Agencies -Other Restrictive Business Practices-2002
- Pinenet Co., Ltd. improperly limited
its trading counterpart's business activities by imposing tie-in sales as
a condition of business engagement in violation of the Fair Trade Law
- Formosa Petrochemical Corporation
allegedly violated the Fair Trade Law by improperly vying for the business
of trading counterparts of its competitors by means of inducements such
as offers to pay their performance bonds
- Tai Ta Gas Station (Formosa Gas
Station's Huatan City location) promoted sales of petroleum products at
low prices by means of cash discounts in violation of the Fair Trade Law
- Pacific Sogo Department Stores
Co., Ltd. violated the Fair Trade Law by imposing improper restrictions
on the business activities of a trading counterpart as a condition of trading
- Far Eastern Air Transport Corp.,
TransAsia Airway Corp., and Uni Airways Corp. accused of violating the Fair
Trade Law by offering lower prices for domestic route tickets to Cheng Hsin
Travel Service
- Allegation that President Chain
Store Corporation employed coercion, inducement with profit, or other improper
means in its franchise recruiting practices to win over trading counterparts
of competitors in violation of the Article 19(iii) of the Fair Trade Law
- Lu T'ien-pao et al. (seven respondents
in total) of Ripo International Bio-technology Co., Ltd. were complained
for stealing another company's trade secrets in violation of the Fair Trade
Law
- Namchow Chemical Industrial Co.,
Ltd. and Chow Chu Distribution Co., Ltd. were complained for marketing the
'Rice Cracks' crackers in violation of Fair Trade Act
[Browse
by APEC Member Economies] [Browse by Subject
Categories] [Home]