apec1.gif (1822 bytes)Decisions of Administrative or Quasi-judicial Agencies - Other Deceptive or Obviously Unfair Conducts-2004

  1. Shin Chang International Natural Gas Equipment & Engineering Co., Ltd. violated the Fair Trade Law by using improper sales methods
  2. Yao Chieh Co., Ou Ke Co., and Chu Hung Co. violates the Fair Trade Law by their participation in the procurement bid regarding the automatic machinery at the wheaten food supply center of Tainan County Shanhua Elementary School
  3. Chia Jei Technology Business Company Ltd. and Pinlight International Technology Company Ltd. violates the Fair Trade Law by publishing comparative advertising
  4. Chinfon Bank violates the Fair Trade Law by declining to provide a copy of the loan agreement to the trading counterpart and requiring the trading counterpart to comply with uncertain general terms(The decision has been revoked)
  5. Chen Kung Saddles Limited violates the Fair Trade Law by faxing the Taiwan Nantou District Criminal Court subpoena to the trading counterparts of its competitor
  6. No disposition was made in the case of Hunya Foods Co., Ltd. was complained for applying improper means to sell goods
  7. Hi Zhang Estate Management Co., Ltd. violates the Fair Trade Law by its improper activities during the trading process of house brokerage
  8. Sin Chang Gas Appliance Co., Ltd. violates the Fair Trade Law by employing improper sales practice in marketing gas safety appliances
  9. No disposition was made in the case of Chia Hui Chemical Industry Co., Ltd. was complained for copying the appearance of another company’s product
  10. No disposition was made in the case of Chi Chun Plastics Co., Ltd. was complained to violate the Fair Trade Law by abusively distributing warning letters of patent infringements
  11. The Great Taipei Gas Line Safety Inspection Corp. violates the Fair Trade Lay by using improper sales methods to sell its natural gas shut-off devices
  12. Core Pacific City Co., Ltd. violates the Fair Trade Law by its incomplete disclosure of information concerning the use of and restrictions on gift certificate redemption in a promotional campaign
  13. Tien Hong Co., Ltd. violates the Fair Trade Law by improper issuing the warning letters of patent infringement
  14. The Chinese Taipei Diving Association violates the Fair Trade Law by concealing material trading information from recruiting new members
  15. No disposition was made in the case of Taipei Icebar International Co., Ltd. was complained to violate the Fair Trade Law by improper using other's trademark
  16. No disposition was made in the case of Apex International Financial Engineering Res. & Tech. Co., Ltd. was complained to violate the Fair Trade Law by plagiarizing the financial data software of another enterprise
  17. Chien Shou-Fu violates the Fair Trade Law by improper issuing warning letters of trademark infringement
  18. GMB Baby Products Co., Ltd. violates the Fair Trade Law by improper rising the prices of surgical facemasks during the SARS outbreak
  19. Jin Jin Accessories violates the Fair Trade Law by producing and selling jewelry products similar to Wang Pei-Hao products
  20. Taiwan Fixed Network Corp. was complained for publishing advertisements claiming "The first three digits dialed when making international calls are now 006 for Chunghwa Telecom users" and "The first three digits dialed when making international calls are now 006 for FarEasTone Telecom/KG Telecom users" in violation of the Fair Trade Law 2005/06/07
  21. Access Public Relations Agency Ltd. was accused of inducing the employees of eCom Public Relations Agency Ltd. to resign, improperly contesting its trading counterparts, and obtaining its business secrets by improper means in possible violation of the Fair Trade Law 2005/06/07
  22. The Fair Trade Commission initiated the investigation of the activity "2004 Michael Jordan Asia Trip - The Show" held by BRS Nike Taiwan Inc., a possible violation of the Fair Trade Law 2005/06/07
  23. Hung-Chong Co. was accused of appending unreasonable terms when entering the contracts with its trading counterparts, in possible violation of the Fair Trade Law 2005/06/07
  24. The American company, Genesis Microchip Corporation was accused of improperly issuing patent infringement warning letters, in possible violation of the Fair Trade Law 2005/06/07
  25. Hsin-Tai Gas Equipment Engineering Co., Ltd. was accused of employing improper means to sell its gas equipment, in possible violation of the Fair Trade Law 2005/06/07
  26. A complaint filed against Fubon Financial Management Co., Ltd. for possible violation of the Fair Trade Law by employing "Fubon", "Fubon Financial" and other businesses and service facilities 2005/06/07
  27. A complaint filed against Futsin Lehwa Brewer and Futian Food Co., Ltd. for possible violation of the Fair Trade Law by manufacturing and selling the earthen jarred "Dragon-Headed Wind Lion God," a suspected counterfeit of the symbol of the earthen jarred "Kinmen Superior Liquor" manufactured by Kinmen Kaoliang Liquor Inc. 2005/06/07

[Browse by APEC Member Economies] [Browse by Subject Categories] [Home]