apec1.gif (1822 bytes)Decisions of Administrative or Quasi-judicial Agencies -Other Deceptive or Obviously Unfair Conducts -2003

  1. Watsons-Park'N Shop Ltd. was complained for requiring suppliers to sign an "electronic supply chain usage contract" and bear the expenses for the usage of the system, in violation of the Fair Trade Law
  2. An investigation initiated by the Fair Trade Commission and a letter of complaint from the Taiwan Provincial Service Station Association stating that National Petroleum Corporation' s franchise stations in the central region had reduced the retail price on their petroleum products in violation of the provisions of Articles 19(iii) and 24 of the Fair Trade Law, and that there were concerted actions by the three major oil suppliers through adjustment of prices for petroleum products following national liberalization of the market for petroleum products
  3. Bridge Cultural & Educational Enterprise, Ltd. violated the Fair Trade Law by restricting distribution regions and holding trading counterparts' distribution contracts in custody
  4. An investigation initiated by the Fair Trade Commission into whether Microsoft Taiwan Corporation and related enterprises abused the power of their exclusive market position to monopolize the software market in violation of the Fair Trade Act
  5. Fu Pang-Hua Chi International Corporation violated Articles 20, 21, and 24 of the Fair Trade Law for imitating the trademark of Fubon Life Insurance Co., Ltd.
  6. Hi-Five Products Developing Co., Ltd. was complained for improper issuance of patent infringement warning letters in possible violation of the Fair Trade Law
  7. International Commercial Bank of China was complained for providing the foreign exchange services concerning purchasing Deutschmarks and selling Euros in violation of the Fair Trade Law
  8. Intel Corporation, Intel Microelectronics Asia Ltd., and Intel Semiconductor Ltd. were complained by Via Technologies, Inc. for statements made during interviews and subsequently published in the media in possible violation of the Fair Trade Act
  9. China Mariner's Assurance Corp. and Fubon Insurance Co., Ltd. were accused of tie-in sales and concerted action when underwriting automobile theft insurance, in violation of the Fair Trade Law
  10. Decision on whether the sales promotion practice, "a handset paired with a number", by mobile telecommunications providers is in violation of the Fair Trade Law
  11. Complaint asserting that the China Trust Company Limited violated the Fair Trade Law by failing to deliver receipts for a housing loan and collecting mandatory account maintenance fees as well as life and accident insurance fees
  12. Totem Technology Co., Ltd. was complained for improper issuance of patent infringement warning letters and publication of warning notices as a possible violation of the Fair Trade Law
  13. The Fair Trade Commission initiated in investigation into whether makers of face masks took advantage of the emergency situation during the domestic outbreak of SARS (Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome) and the resulting imbalance of supply and demand to raise prices inappropriately in violation of the Fair Trade Law
  14. Charleston Co., Ltd. imported and sold "Three-Year Erguo Liquor" and "38-Year Old Special Erguotou", in imitation of the symbols (trade dress) of the "Special Kaoliang Liquor" and "Kinmen 38 Special Kiaoliang Liquor" products of the Kinmen Distillery in violation of the Fair Trade Act
  15. Wei Hsing Industrial Ltd., Kang Hsin Industrial Ltd., and Ting Cheng Ltd. were alleged to improperly participate in a bidding held by Po Chia Primary School in Taipei's Wenshan District in violation of the Fair Trade Law
  16. Ta An Medical Supplies Company violated the Fair Trade Law by improper price gouging, taking advantage of the emergency situation during the domestic outbreak of SARS (Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome) and the resulting imbalance of supply and demand
  17. Complaint against Jhan Wang Construction Co., Ltd. for failing to provide prospective clients with ample time to review contracts for pre-sale housing units in its "Sin Di Lai Heng No. 58 Shih-Da Jyu" and "Sin Di Lai Heng No. 59 Jin Zuan Sin Di" housing developments, which was an obviously unfair conduct that is able to affect the trading order
  18. Da Li Construction Co., Ltd. was complained for failing to provide customers with adequate time to review contracts while selling their "Sin Di Lai Heng No. 60 First-Class Residence" pre-sold housing units, constituting an illegal, obviously unfair practice sufficient to adversely affect the trading order
  19. RT Mart International Ltd. was alleged abuse of its superior market position by inappropriate collection of additional fees from suppliers, in violation of the provisions of the Fair Trade Law
  20. Jih Sun International Bank was complained for failing to disclose the interest rate while signing a loan agreement in violation of the Fair Trade Law

[Browse by APEC Member Economies] [Browse by Subject Categories] [Home]