apec1.gif (1822 bytes)Decisions of Administrative or Quasi-judicial Agencies -Other Deceptive or Obviously Unfair Conducts -2001

  1. San Chiang Construction, Hsin Chi Construction and others allegedly violated the Fair Trade Law by manipulating the bidding for a construction project in Lin Nei Hsiang, Yunlin County through the lending and borrowing of construction licenses
  2. The Taiwan Paper Industry Association alleged that clauses providing for stock out penalties in procurement contracts drafted by the Ministry of National Defense Welfare Department and PXstore Ltd. violate the Fair Trade Law
  3. Li Yen Medical Instruments and Hung Chien Co. allegedly engaged in improper sales (marketing) practices in violation of the Fair Trade Law
  4. ADDA Corporation disseminates false information on its web site homepage in violation of Article 24 of the Fair Trade Law
  5. Pacific Construction Co., Ltd. required prospective buyers for their pre-sold units in the housing project to first pay deposits before a copy of the purchase agreement would be provided for their review. This constitutes a patently unfair practice sufficient to affect trading order, which had violated Article 24 of the Fair Trade Law
  6. Importation and sale of counterfeit Pikachu toy products by Hui Ching Trading Co., Ltd. in violation of the Fair Trade Law
  7. Foundation Technology Co., Ltd. committed an obviously unfair act by engaging in false advertising sufficient to affect trading order in violation of the Fair Trade Law
  8. Bank SinoPac's incorporation of a clause into its housing loan contracts requiring borrowers to waive their rights to the possession of a duplicated copy of the contract, which had disrupted the trading order and violated Article 24 of the Fair Trade Law
  9. Companies participating in bidding for road-widening project in Kuangping Li and Kuanghua Li, Hsihu Town, Changhua County used licenses and other documentation from other companies to inflate the number of bidders for the project in violation of the Fair Trade Law
  10. Tso Chieh Parking Garage Co., Ltd. created the illusion of competition in the bidding of the No. 11 Underground Public Parking Garage in Tainan City for private operation
  11. Shun Hsin Home Appliance Co., Ltd. falsely promoted products under the disguise of being a gas company, and used gas safety inspections as a pretext to impair the public's right to freely choose whether to trade with it (purchase products from it), in violation of the Fair Trade Law's prohibition against deceptive acts sufficient to affect the trading order
  12. Taiwan Sunisland Int. Co., Ltd., when selling foreign resort membership cards, exploited its trading dominance, and engaged in deceptive and obviously unfair acts that affected the trading order
  13. The packaging of Jin Syn Supre 2T motor oil sold by Hsin Ho Cheng Enterprise Co., Ltd. was copied from the packaging of other products, in violation of Article 24 of the Fair Trade Law
  14. Hi-Life International Co., Ltd. violated the Fair Trade Law for exploiting its advantageous market position to collect improper additional fees from a supplier
  15. Niko Mart violated the Fair Trade Law for exploiting its advantageous market position to collect improper additional fees from a supplier
  16. Yung Cheng Ltd. alleged to have borrowed bidding qualification documents from others when participating in bidding for a prosthetic kidney procurement contract of Provincial Chiayi Hospital, in violation of the Fair Trade Law
  17. Wellcome Taiwan Company Ltd. violated the Fair Trade Law for using its advantageous market position to collect improper additional fees from a supplier
  18. United Daily News Co., Ltd. was alleged in violating the Fair Trade Law for the content of its standardized distribution agreement and for its termination of the distribution agreement
  19. Tuntex Distinct Corp. allegedly violated the Fair Trade Law by false advertisment of the "Tuntex Shanhaikuan" condominium construction project and failure to inform homebuyers of design alterations
  20. The Hualien County Office of the Ministry of Justice Investigation Bureau requested an investigation into violations of the Fair Trade Law by companies bidding for public works projects being undertaken by Fenglin Chen (Township)
  21. Yulon Motor Co., Ltd. allegedly ran advertisements for sales of the SENTRA 180 model car in violation of Articles 21 and 24 of the Fair Trade Law
  22. Taiwan Tanabe Food Co. allegedly used another person's well-known symbols commonly known to relevant enterprises and consumers as its company name in violation of Articles 20 and 24 of the Fair Trade Law
  23. A complaint alleging that the trade dress of the canned abalone products sold by Monteal Co., Ltd. and Pao Chin Wang Enterprises Co., Ltd. imitated that of the "Che Lun Brand" canned abalone product, which is likely to impact the trading order and is an obviously unfair competition
  24. Hao Sheng Handicraft Shop was complained for alleged violation of the Fair Trade Law by charging for materials under the pretext of hiring part-timers working from home
  25. Comwave International Ltd. alleged to have violated the Fair Trade Law by improperly issuing warning letters regarding copyright infringements
  26. Life Insurance Company of Georgia (Taiwan Branch) was complained for increasing insurance premiums in violation of the Fair Trade Law
  27. Man Tien Hsia Advertising Corp. alleged to have violated the Fair Trade Law in its real estate sales transactions
  28. Axistar Trading Co., Ltd. was complained for advertisement use of the "MONTBLANC" and "white star" marks throughout its commercial activities in violation of Article 24 of the Fair Trade Law
  29. Counterfeiting of others' symbols (trade dress) by Ta Chia Dairy Co., Ltd. in violation of Article 24 of the Fair Trade Law
  30. Formosa Plastics Gas Station Corp.'s use of "Formosa Plastics" as a specific part of the name under which it operated gas stations and related services constituted an obviously unfair act sufficient to adversely affect the trading order
  31. American company cnYES.com, Inc. was accused of plagiarizing the news content of the Commercial Times and the China Times Express and reproducing the content on its website in violation of Article 24 of the Fair Trade Law
  32. Improper promotional methods used by Chun Hsiang International Cosmetology Ltd., Co. in violation of Article 24 of the Fair Trade Law
  33. Real Media Technology Co., Ltd. was complained for using Sony Computer Entertainment's well-known Trademark "Playstation" as a domain name in violation of the Fair Trade Law
  34. Inquiry regarding the handling of vegetable price fluctuations in the aftermath of typhoons, torrent, and other natural disasters, and the impact of Typhoon Toraji on the supply and demand for vegetables in Chinese Taipei
  35. Sung Enterprise Inc. (an American firm) violated the Fair Trade Law for wrongfully sending out warning letters through an attorney to the complainant's customers
  36. Yahoo Taiwan Inc. violated the Fair Trade Law by plagiarizing content on the "New Websites" section of Yam Digital Technology Co., Ltd.'s Website
  37. Hsiluo Agricultural Products Market Co., Ltd. was complained for unfairly collecting wholesale market management fees in violation of the Fair Trade Law
  38. Complaint alleging that All Chinese Co., Ltd.'s classified job ads in newspapers and magazines violated the Fair Trade Law
  39. Mighty Ambition Co., Ltd., despite knowing that the "Pikachu" series of designer figurines were commonly known to consumers, unauthorizedly manufactured and imported counterfeit products in violation of Article 24 of the Fair Trade Law
  40. The US Integrated Circuit Systems, Inc. allegedly published an advertisement in DigiTimes that damaged the business reputation of another in violation of the Fair Trade Law
  41. Complaint against He Hsin Technology Company, Ltd. for improper registration of "Manulife," another party's well-known business symbol, as a domain name in violation of Article 24 of the Fair Trade Law
  42. Ex-officio investigation to determine whether Mr. Ou-Yang Ling-tu (operating under the Chi Feng Trading Company) violated the Free Trade Law by hoarding rice wine
  43. Carrefour Taiwan JV violated the Fair Trade Law for exploiting its advantageous market position to collect improper additional fees from a supplier
  44. Hon Yang Construction & Land Development Co., Ltd., Full-Yuan Development Enterprise Co., Ltd., and Wei Ku Enterprise Co. Ltd. in Taiwan Sugar Corporation's open tender for the T'ung Hsin Chia Yuan joint housing construction project at its Huwei plant location in violation of the Fair Trade Law
  45. Taipei Seafood Distribution Corp. alleged to have colluded with illegal seafood product distribution groups in disrupting the trading order of wholesale seafood auction markets in violation of the Fair Trade Law
  46. Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd.'s Premium Rate Service Program Fee Contract alleged to violate the Fair Trade Law

[Browse by APEC Member Economies] [Browse by Subject Categories] [Home]