Decisions of Administrative or Quasi-judicial Agencies -Other Deceptive or Obviously Unfair Conducts -1999

1. Ta P'ing Cable Television Ltd., Co., alleges violations of the Fair Trade Law by San Li Video Co., Sheng Ch'i Co., Pa Ta International Broadcasting Co., and Ta T'un Min Chu Cable Broadcasting Systems Co.
   
2. Ch'ang Lin Enterprise Co., Ltd.'s use of packaging similar to that of the K'o Ch'au Ling drying agent constituted unfair competition
   
3. Unfair competition of Siemens Nixdorf Information Systems Ltd., Chinese Taipei Branch for abusive issue of warning letters
   
4. Violation of the Fair Trade Law by Postal Remittance and Savings Bank for raising fees to public utilities for payment of accounts through deposit account remittances
   
5. Professional E. E. accused of designating company and brand in a project to add second power supply circuit at Academia Sinica in violation of the Fair Trade Law
   
6. Alleged violation of the Supervisory Regulation of Multi-Level Sales by Freemaker International Co., Ltd.
   
7. Violation of the Fair Trade Law by the rust removal of water treatment plant project at the Lin Yuan petrochemical factory of Chinese Petroleum Corporation
   
8. A complaint was filed against Pei En Enterprise Co., stating that the company mailed out a letter warning against trademark infringement in violation of the Fair Trade Law
   
9. Violation of the Fair Trade Law by Chin Huan Hsi International Travel Co. Ltd. for deceptive acts that are sufficient to affect trading order
   
10. A complaint was filled against Jenn Feng Electric Industrial Co., stating that the company mailed out letters warning against patent infringements which violated the Fair Trade Law
    
11. Violation of the Fair Trade Law by Ambassador Resorts Ltd. Taiwan Branch when selling resort membership for engaging in obviously unfair acts against its trading counterparts that could substantially affect trading order
    
12. The Lungyen Group allegedly violated the Fair Trade Law when selling the “Paishawan Memorial Park”
    
13. Zue Shin Real Estate violated the Fair Trade Law for failing to fully disclose trade information, and therefore mislead its trading counterparts
    
14. Taiwan Paging Network Inc. violated the Fair Trade Law for unilaterally raising the price of the “One-Dollar Paging Services”
    
15. The bottles of the “Weilih Pure Water” sold by Weilih Corp. were copied from the bottles of “Taisun Pure Water” produced by Taisun Enterprise Corp. in violation of Article 24 of the Fair Trade Law
    
16. The Taiwan Tobacco and Wine Board [formerly the Taiwan Tobacco and Wine Monopoly Bureau] sent a letter to the Fair Trade Commission requesting the Commission to investigate alleged hoarding of rice wine by retailers in violation of the Fair Trade Law
    
17. Tuntex Distinct Corp. violated the Fair Trade Law for failing to provide contract for review and the change of its original product design
    
18. Lin, Po-hsien sent warning letters (attested letters registered with the post office) in violation of Article 24 of the Fair Trade Law
    
19. Chie Mao Development and Construction Co., Ltd., engaged in deceptive acts of housing sale capable of affecting trading order
20. Obviously unfair acts sufficient to affect the trading order by the Kaohsiung American English Foreign Language Review School
21. Procter & Gamble Co., Ltd. was accused of using its dominant market position against downstream businesses unfairly in violation of the Fair Trade Law
22. Taiwan Automobile Co., Ltd., covertly pre-selected the contractor when calling for tenders for provision of bus seat covers. This was an obviously unfair act in violation of the Fair Trade Law
23. Mr. Ch'en Liang-cheng violated Fair Trade Law Article 24 with deceptive acts that influenced the trading order
24. Alleged violation of the Fair Trade Law by Hewlett Packard for improper sending of warning letters regarding infringement of patent rights
25. Disposition against Wang Hsin-mou of the Lao Pai Wang Fishng Bait Company for inappropriately sending warning letters
26. Hsieh He Iron Works et al. violated the Fair Trade Law for involving an illegal bidding on a chlorination equipment project at Feng Shan Plant of Taiwan Province Tap Water Co.
27. Complaint filed against Pan Pacific International Marketing Co., Ltd., for allegedly violating the Fair Trade Law in its sale of membership cards for vacation resorts
28. Golden Communications Co., Ltd., was complained for supplying videotapes under unreasonable contract terms and at unreasonable prices
29. Chung Chun Industries Ltd. is alleged to have violated the Fair Trade Law by raising and setting uniform prices for petroleum products at its T'u Niu gas station during the "921" earthquake disaster period
30. Chin T'ai Yi Water Tank Ltd., Co. violated the Fair Trade Law for inflating its water tank prices during the 921 earthquake- recovering period
31. Kingmate Co., Ltd. violated the Fair Trade Law for abusing its market position to improperly set its price level for small generator sets during the 921 earthquake-recovering period
32. Investigation on the violation of the Fair Trade Law by Shun Cheng Printing Ltd., Co., upon the request of the Central Chinese Taipei Office of the Investigation Bureau, the Ministry of Justices

[Browse by APEC Member Economies] [Browse by Subject Categories] [Home]