Decisions of Administrative or Quasi-judicial Agencies -Other Deceptive or Obviously Unfair Conducts -1998

1. Chiyuan Cable and Telecommunication Corp. Ltd. violated the Fair Trade Law for incorporating untrue notes into channel purchase contract stating that it represented all cable system operators in the southern district of Miaoli
   
2. Le Yang Enterprise Co., Ltd. violated the Fair Trade Law for sending letters of notice and issuing public notices
   
3. The Private Hospitals & Clinics Association (PHCA) violated the Fair Trade Law by developing a consulting fee schedule for medical record inquiring by insurance Institutions
   
4. The RCA Thomson Licensing Corporation was complained for its violation of the Fair Trade Law by improperly collecting royalties
   
5. Shin Lung Natural Gas Co., Ltd. was complained for its abuse of market position by improperly determining the fees for natural gas pipe laying work
   
6. He Wei Broadcasting Co., Ltd. violated the Fair Trade Law for withholding price information of programs
   
7. Administrative settlement between Matra Transport Corporation and the Fair Trade Commission for Matra's alleged violation of the Fair Trade Law
8. Corrective measures regarding construction firm's request that pre-sold housing unit buyers sign a promissory note as security
9. Hsin Shih Po Cable Broadcast System Corp. violated the Fair Trade Law for its acquisition of regional distributorship for certain channels/programs in Chungho and Yungho
   
10. Nutricia (H.K.) Ltd., Taiwan Branch violated the Fair Trade Law for its act of publishing comparative advertisement
    
11. Alleged violation of the Fair Trade Law by Somchen Co. Ltd, a household production agency
    
12. Jih Ch'ang Leather Goods Development Co., Ltd. filed a complaint against Chia Ssu K'e Industrial Co., Ltd. for the latter's alleged violation of the Fair Trade Law
    
13. Nan Yi Bookstore violated the Fair Trade Law by engaging in discriminatory treatment and imposition of improper restrictions [on the activities of its trading counterparts] while selling elementary school reference books
    
14. Hui Lan Communications Co. Ltd. (the respondent) was allegedly engaged in deceptive promotional activity featuring "gifts with subscription," which could have adversely affected trading order
    
15. Ta Hsin Advertising Company violated Article 24 of the Fair Trade Law for its failure to disclose to its clients the option to use "Letter of Offer", provided by the Ministry of Interior, as an alternative to the requirement of negotiation deposit
    
16. Complaint against Pacific Construction Company regarding its false statements in sales advertisements and deceptive/obviously unfair acts relating the "Pacific Commercial Center"
    
17. Best Leading Lady International Beauticians Ltd. failed to submit relevant information without justifiable reasons, within the time limit in the course of a Fair Trade Commission investigation regarding its alleged violation of the Fair Trade Law
    
18. Alleged violation of the Fair Trade Law by Fu Yi Shan Co., Ltd. for copying the external appearance of another person's product
    
19. Lien Ch'eng Real Estate violated the Fair Trade Law for misleading its trading counterparts through incomplete disclosure of trading information
    
20. Complaint by Ares International Corporation against MTi Abraxsys System Inc., an American company, for violating Articles 22 and 24 of the Fair Trade Law
    
21. Alleged violation of Articles 20 and 24 of the Fair Trade Law by Batman International Trade Corporation
    
22. Violation of the Fair Trade Law [FTL] by Farcent Enterprise Co., Ltd. [respondent] for obviously sending attorney letters alleging patent infringement
    
23. Hung Ming Metal Company [complainant] filed a complaint against Sucoot Co., Ltd. [respondent] for violating the Fair Trade Law by sending, in its name and in that of its patent attorney, warning letters alleging patent infringement
    
24. Violation of Article 24 of the Fair Trade Law [FTL] by PresiCarre Corp. [respondent] for abusing its advantageous market position to exclude the suppliers from competition thereby adversely affecting the trading order
    
25. Complaint against Architect Ch'en Hui-hsiung for deliberately stalling the screening of ceiling materials to be used for the new project of the MOTC Telecommunications Service Complex, with the intent to benefit a certain material supplier
    
26. Violation of the Fair Trade Law by China Engineering Consultants Inc. for specifying use of certain product brands for the stretchable aperture construction of the CKS Airport Phase-2 Project
    
27. Wu Ling Shan Chuang sewage treatment project's [Project] tying of specifications in violation of the Fair Trade Law
    
28. Complaints against four enterprises, including Chung Hwa Computer Center, for the violation of the Fair Trade Law by their comparative advertisement for fax reception/transfer service
    
29. Violation of the Fair Trade Law and the Regulation Governing Multi-level Sales by Giraffe International Co., Ltd.
    
30. Alleged violation of the Fair Trade Law by Miller Brewing Company [respondent] for exploiting another person's work result
    
31. Violation of the Fair Trade Law by Shin Nan Petroleum Gas Co., Ltd.
    
32. Compensation by photo developer for damage to or loss of customer film
33. Violation of Article 24 of the Fair Trade Law by Bank of America NT&SA for failure to specify the interest rate in its loan agreement with its trading counterparts
    
34. "Chin Yuan" trademark owner Hwu Chen-Jin's violation of Article 24 of the Fair Trade Law by issuing warning letters sufficient to adversely affect the trading order
    
35. Violation of the Fair Trade Law by the Department of Housing and Urban Development, Taiwan Provincial Government
    
36. Violation of the Fair Trade Law by Lien Hua P'u T'i Co., Ltd. for falsely advertising its "Healthy Environmental Protection Incense"
    
37. Violation of the Fair Trade Law by the Department of Housing and Urban Development, Taiwan Provincial Government
    
38. Bidders were allegedly in violation of the Fair Trade Law in bidding for the "Environmental Protection Detecting System" construction tendered by the Refinery Institute of the China Petroleum Corp.
    
39. Violation of the Fair Trade Law and the Supervisory Regulations of Multi-level Sales by Vastworld Trading Co., Ltd.
    
40. Violation of the Fair Trade Law and the Supervisory Regulation of Multi-level Sales by Asia Leching International Co., Ltd.
    
41. Deceptive acts engaged in by Chie Mao Construction Co., Ltd. that were sufficient to adversely affect the trading order
42. Violation of the Fair Trade Law by Hung Ch'i International Co., Ltd.
    
43. Violation of the Fair Trade Law by Umax Data Systems, Inc. for circulating false information
    
44. Alleged violation of the Fair Trade Law by Tong-Fu Jewelry Shop for failing to sufficiently disclose the method of price calculation; alleged violation of the Fair Trade Law by Taipei Jewelers' Association for fixing the method of price calculation.
    
45. Violation of the Fair Trade Law by several government agencies for requiring the type of vehicles that could be used to bid for a contract to supply compactor-style waste disposal vehicles be imported and fully pre-packaged
    
46. Ten Comfort Corporation engaged in acts of interference by stating at the distribution channels of competitors that their thermal compress infringed on patent rights.
    
47. Violation of the Fair Trade Law by Dynalab Inc. for the sending of a letter warning of a patent infringement
    
48. The Taoyuan District Court requested the FTC determine whether or not Apollo Story Whisky violated Fair Trade Law Article 24 by imitating Suntory Whisky02/01/01
49. Hua Hsin Hang Co. (the winning bidder on the "China Petroleum Project to Relocate Elevated Gas Pipes Running Into Box Culverts, Embankments, and Bridges") alleged to have used licenses borrowed from Chi Ku Co. and Tao Hsin Co. in the bidding process
    
50. Unfair competition of Sijia Trading Company Limited for issuing warning letters in connection with alleged patent infringement
    

[Browse by APEC Member Economies] [Browse by Subject Categories] [Home]