Decisions of Administrative or Quasi-judicial
Agencies -False,Untrue and Misleading Advertisement-2003
- Fu Lung Construction Co., Ltd.
made false advertising for promoting sales of units in its "Hsin Kai Yue"
construction project in violation of the Fair Trade Law
- Wonderswan Company Limited Taiwan
Branch was complained for making false advertising in violation of Article
21 of the Fair Trade Act through the use of the "24 hour" indication on
its signboard and membership cards
- Nice Beauty.com Corporation was
complained for violation of Article 21 of the Fair Trade Act through alleged
false statement of product contents on its nicebeauty.com website and product
labels
- Fu Pang-Hua Chi International
Corporation violated Articles 20, 21, and 24 of the Fair Trade Law for imitating
the trademark of Fubon Life Insurance Co., Ltd.
- American Express Company Taiwan
was complained through false advertising for traveler's checks in violation
of Article 21 of the Fair Trade law
- Kuang Chuan Dairy Co., Ltd. was
for publication of an advertisement claiming "Kuang Chuan has been awarded
a gold medal for the world's top honors in dairy products three years straight,"
in violation of the Fair Trade Law
- Megaful Co., Ltd. falsely made
goods advertisement in violation of the Fair Trade Act
- Chang Yi Enterprise Co., Ltd.
was complained for false advertising in connection with building advertisements
for its "Chang Yi Hawaii American Town Houses" in violation of the Fair
Trade Act
- CEDCA Taiwan Co., Ltd. allegedly
violated Article 21 of the Fair Trade Law by false advertising of the American
Culture Camp
- The International Commercial Bank
of China and Promail Inc. allegedly printed false advertisements in their
mail order catalogs in violation of Article 21 of the Fair Trade Law
- Warning to New Century InfoComm
Tech Co., Ltd. for false advertising in newspapers, using false and misleading
presentations
- Ta Chong Commercial Bank Co.,
Ltd. made misleading representations in advertisements for its "Much" cash
card, claiming "no processing fees" and "no service charge"
- Ta Chong Commercial Bank Co.,
Ltd. made misleading representations in advertisements for its "Much" cash
card, claiming "no processing fees" and "no service charge"
- Multi-level sales enterprise Chao
Shih Chi New Generation Technology Co., Ltd. improperly deducted a fee from
the refund given to participants for goods returned upon termination of
their contract, in violation of Article 23-2(2) of the Fair Trade Law
[Browse
by APEC Member Economies] [Browse by Subject
Categories] [Home]