Decisions of Administrative or Quasi-judicial Agencies -False,Untrue and Misleading Advertisement-2002

1. Speed United Corporation and Jun Long Industrial Co. Ltd. allegedly violated Article 21 of the Fair Trade Law by making false and misleading representations of place of manufacture on product packaging
2. Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. violated the Fair Trade Law with its "Buy Two Minutes and Get Five Minutes Free" advertisement
3. Watson's Park 'N Shop Ltd. violated Article 21 of the Fair Trade Law through false advertising
4. TelePaq Technology Inc. violated the Fair Trade Law with its advertisement of "NT$1 Million in Cash Promotion Program"
5. Chyuan Lien Enterprise Co., Ltd. violated the Fair Trade Law by abusing its relatively dominant position to inappropriately collect a "business premises rent" surcharge from suppliers
6. Hsong-Feng Int., Corp. alleged to have engaged in exaggerated and untruthful advertising in selling its “Feng Li Ting Microcomputer Breast Massager,” in violation of Article 21 of the Fair Trade Law
7. San Yang Energy Development Co., Ltd. allegedly violated Article 21 of the Fair Trade Law by making false representations in its advertising catalog
8. Hi-Life International Co., Ltd. was complained for using false advertising and deceptive or obviously unfair methods to recruit and exclude its franchisees in violation of the Fair Trade Law
9. Sin Li Din Bio-Tech Enterprise Co., Ltd. allegedly violated Article 21 of the Fair Trade Law by making false and misleading representations in its advertisements
10. Ho I Lock Co., Ltd. violated the Fair Trade Law in using false and misleading representations for the sales of it's A-locks and through engaging in obviously unfair acts capable of affecting the trading order
11. Pacific Sogo Department Stores Co., Ltd. violated the Fair Trade Law for using false and misleading representations on posters during anniversary celebration
12. Complaint alleging Chin Chih Spirits, Ltd.'s advertisement of “Chin Chih Kan Chun Rice Wine” contained false representations in violation of Article 21 of the Fair Trade Law
13. ETWebs Taiwan Inc. was complained for publishing false advertising in its “3C Convenience Card” promotion in violation of the Fair Trade Law
14. Namchow Chemical Industrial Co., Ltd. and Chow Chu Distribution Co., Ltd. were complained for marketing the 'Rice Cracks' crackers in violation of Fair Trade Act
15. Taiwan Provincial English Studies Society was complained for violation of the Fair Trade Law by citing a letter issued by the Ministry of Education in the promotional information for the activity “National Junior High and Elementary School English Proficiency Ranking Test” and listing the Ministry as the directing office
16. Kuo-Yang Tire Co., Ltd. violated the Fair Trade Law through publishing advertisement for Q8 petroleum products quoting prices well below the market value

[Browse by APEC Member Economies] [Browse by Subject Categories] [Home]