apec1.gif (1822 bytes)Decisions of Administrative or Quasi-judicial Agencies -False,Untrue and Misleading Advertisement-2001

  1. Shang Mei Construction Co., Ltd. published false advertisements in violation of the Fair Trade Law
  2. Golden Fitness Co., Ltd. allegedly violated Article 21 of the Fair Trade Law by falsely claiming in advertisements that it has "tanning booth" facilities
  3. Witen International Co., Ltd. engaged in false advertising in violation of the Fair Trade Law
  4. Life Information Services Co., Ltd. made false and misleading presentations in a flier with respect to the substance of its services
  5. Foundation Technology Co., Ltd. committed an obviously unfair act by engaging in false advertising sufficient to affect trading order in violation of the Fair Trade Law
  6. Sino Network Co., Ltd. violated Article 21 of the Fair Trade Law by falsely claiming "Sino Network is Now the Fourth Largest ISP Nationwide" and a provider of "Global Internet Telephone Services" in one of its advertisements
  7. The selling of the building "River of Hope" by Hung Chu Construction Co., Ltd. was alleged to involve false advertising in violation of the Fair Trade Law
  8. Chu Hsiang International Ltd. Co. claimed in a commercial regarding the "Tai Mung Fung Magnetic Energy Feeling Massager Bra" run on cable TV that the product increased actual breast size in violation of the Fair Trade Law
  9. BJICTI Corporation published false and misleading advertisements in violation of the Fair Trade Law
  10. Tuntex Distinct Corp. allegedly violated the Fair Trade Law by false advertisment of the "Tuntex Shanhaikuan" condominium construction project and failure to inform homebuyers of design alterations
  11. Yulon Motor Co., Ltd. allegedly ran advertisements for sales of the SENTRA 180 model car in violation of Articles 21 and 24 of the Fair Trade Law
  12. United Highway Bus Corp. made false and misleading presentations in an advertisement with respect to discount ticket prices in violation of Article 21 of the Fair Trade Law
  13. To Yung Electrical Corp. and Tiao Wang International Co., Ltd. were complained for false advertising in violation of the Fair Trade Law
  14. Chi Tiao Lung Restaurant violated Article 21 of the Fair Trade Law for making flase representations on magazine advertisements

[Browse by APEC Member Economies] [Browse by Subject Categories] [Home]