Decisions of Administrative or Quasi-judicial
Agencies -False,Untrue and Misleading Advertisement-2000
- Disposition
against Hsing Huan Realty, Ltd. for publishing false advertisements and
engaging in conducts which were capable of affecting the trading order,
in violation of Articles 21 and 24 of the Fair Trade Law
- Top Disk
Enterprise Co., Ltd. was accused of violating Article 21(1) of the Fair
Trade Law for carrying false advertisements on the packaging cartons of
its products
- T'ai Ho
Construction Co., Ltd. violated the Fair Trade Law for its false advertising
- Austin
Beauty Shop's advertisement "Be slim and have a dainty figure for only NT$599"
violated the Fair Trade Law
- False
advertising by Huang Yu-ching Beauty Salon in violation of the Fair Trade
Law
- Yeou Fwu
Photography Supply Co. makes false advertisement in violation of Article
21 of the Fair Trade law
- Complaint
that Hua-Shio Broadcasting Enterprise Co. Ltd. recruited or offered to broker
entertainers through newspaper advertisements in violation of the Fair Trade
Law
- Complaint
against Hsien-an Enterprise, Ta-wei Yang Hang, P'in-ch'en Enterprise Ltd.,
Hsian-chu Enterprise, and Chiu-chih-tsui Co., Ltd. for the sale of Whisky
beverages bearing false labeling in violation of the first paragraph of
article 21 of the Fair Trade Law
- Complaint
alleging the "Green Leaf Village" house sale advertisement produced
by Ch'ang Yi Industrial Co., Ltd. contained false information in violation
of the Fair Trade Law
- Complaint
against the Jack Wang Motor Co. Ltd. alleging false advertising in violation
of the Fair Trade Law
- Complaint
against Iou Liang International Co., Ltd. and Lien-Ch'i International Co.,
Ltd. of misleading advertising in violation of the Fair Trade Law
- A complaint
was filed that Hsun Yi Satellite Communications Co., Ltd. violated the Fair
Trade Law through false advertisement
- A complaint
alleging P'ai Chin Han Co. Ltd. engaged in false advertising in violation
of the Fair Trade Law
- Tunyun
Co., Ltd. and Chien Tai Cement Co., Ltd. published false advertising for
the "85 International Plaza" by concealing relevant information
on public facilities in violation of the Fair Trade Law
- Wen Ben
Aluminium Extrusions Co., Ltd. published a false advertisement for home
appliance electromagnetic radiation protectors and related products in violation
of the Fair Trade Law
- A complaint
alleging Chu T'ung Construction Co., Ltd. made false and misleading presentations
with respect to the appearance of a building in an advertisement for pre-sold
homes in violation of the law
- A complaint
alleging Mei Chia Ltd. Co. made false presentations in the "Energy
Water Massage Bra" advertisement in issue 512 of Fei Ts'ui Magazine
in violation of the Fair Trade Law
- Media
Max International Co., Ltd. ran false advertisements on its Web site in
violation of Article 21 of the Fair Trade Law
- Mei Shih
You Chih Home Moving Ltd. Co. published false advertisements on its Web
site in violation of Fair Trade Law Article 21
- A complaint
alleging Maplix Int'l Cosmetics Co., Ltd. and Cosmetic Interflow Association
of R.O.C. made false presentations in a cosmetics vocational training advertisement
- Farty
Sou Spirit Lamp Development Co., Ltd. made false and misleading presentations
in its advertisements and on its circulars and packaging in violation of
the Fair Trade Law
[Browse
by APEC Member Economies] [Browse by Subject
Categories] [Home]