apec1.gif (1822 bytes)Decisions of Administrative or Quasi-judicial Agencies -False,Untrue and Misleading Advertisement-1999

  1. False advertising by Ta Hsin Tien Min Chu Cable Television Limited Company (hereinafter "Ta Hsin Tien") concerning operator qualifications
  2. Violation of Fair Trade Law by Yi Chia Li Beauty Ltd., Co. for false advertising
  3. Ta Ting Mei Construction and Development Corp. violated the Fair Trade Law for its fasle advertisement on the “Hsinchu Town Houses”
  4. Chiu Ting Construction Co., Ltd.'s false advertising in violation of the Fair Trade Law
  5. Kwang Yang Motor Co., Ltd. violated the Fair Trade Law for its false advertisements on Filly 50/80 motorcycles
  6. The Central Trust and the Department of Commodities Affairs violated the Fair Trade Law for its unreasonable contract provisions on international procurement for bidders
  7. The Lungyen Group allegedly violated the Fair Trade Law when selling the “Paishawan Memorial Park”
  8. Ch' un Heng International Beauty Co., Ltd. violated the Fair Trade Law for publishing false advertisements
  9. Hung Lei Cosmetology Co., Ltd., violated the Fair Trade Law for making false and misleading representations in its advertisement about its service quality
  10. Kingtel Telecommunication Corporation made misleading statements about product functions in its mobile phone advertisements
  11. Carrefour Co. Ltd.'s labeled prices did not correspond to actual sales prices in a violation of the Fair Trade Law
  12. A complaint alleging that Chia Yi Co., Ltd. used the name Pei Lian She Fu Li P'in Kung Hsiao Chan [United Northern Community PX Goods Supplier] in violation of the Fair Trade Law
  13. Taiwan Cellular Corporation placed false advertisements in violation of the Fair Trade Law
  14. Violation of the Fair Trade Law by Hsiao Mu Chiang Teaching Material Publishing House for publishing false advertising
  15. Alleged violation of the Fair Trade Law by France Bed Co., Ltd. in its representation of the scope of its "Teh Tai & Design" trademark right
  16. Evertrust Rehouse Co., Ltd., published false advertisements in violation of the Fair Trade Law
  17. Ao Szu Ting Beauty Salon violated the Fair Trade Law for making false and misleading representations regarding the result of its breast enlargement program in its "Speedy SPR Breast Sculpting Plan" advertisements
  18. Chun Hun International Beauty Co., Ltd., published false advertisements in violation of the Fair Trade Law
  19. Violation of Articles 21(1) and 24 of the Fair Trade Law by Chyuan Lien Enterprise Co., Ltd. for its use of the following names at its supply outlets and in its overall business practices: R.O.C. Cooperative Association, Civil Servant and Teacher Welfare Goods Supply Centers, etc.
  20. Tong Ho Development Company Limited violated the Fair Trade Law for false advertising of its "Universal Health World Village Membership Cards"
  21. SATV Enterprise Co., Ltd. was alleged to have engaged in false advertising in violation of the Fair Trade Law
  22. Hsin Min Gas Safety Equipment Co., Ltd. violated the Fair Trade Law for practicing false advertising
  23. Complaint alleged Famous International Beauty Co., Ltd. violated Article 21(3) of the Fair Trade Law in its "Men Are Clueless About Women's Dreams?!" advertisement 07/09/01

[Browse by APEC Member Economies] [Browse by Subject Categories] [Home]