Decisions of Administrative or Quasi-judicial Agencies -False,Untrue and Misleading Advertisement-1997

1. Pan German Motors Ltd. was complained for its false advertising about the car installments at the 0% interest rate in violation of Article 21 of the Fair Trade Law
   
2. A complaint was filed against CitiBank alleging that the contents of its “ Off to Macao Promotion” advertisements were false and untrue
   
3. Unfair competition resulting from a fraudulent prize-drawing activity of Tuntex Mar
   
4. A complaint was filed against Pacific Rehouse Co, Ltd. for its false advertising on the transaction price
   
5. Swire Coca-Cola Taiwan, Ltd. violated the Fair Trade Law for failing to provide prizes under the promotion of "Youth World Cool Point Cumulation"
   
6. Yuan Shang Construction Co., Ltd. violated the Fair Trade Law for false advertising of the Golden Chicken Plaza Shih Lin Night Market project
   
7. Shepherd King International Trade Co., Ltd. violated the Fair Trade Law for its safe product brochures and advertisements were untrue
   
8. Mei T'ing Feng Co., Ltd. was complained for false advertising in violation of the Fair Trade Law
   
9. Kao (Taiwan) Corporation's false advertising for its prize promotion regarding its concentrated washing powder "Yi-ch'ih-ling" [meaning "one spoon works."]
   
10. Taipei District Court requested the Fair Trade Commission in writing to determine whether Taiwan branch of Hang Ten Enterprise Corp. violated the Fair Trade Law for selling apparels with "HANG TEN"
    
11. Yue Shih Tsong Heng Enterprise Corp. violated the Fair Trade Law for publishing false and untrue advertisements and for counterfeiting the symbol of others
    
12. Ching Hua Eyeglasses Store violated the Fair Trade Law for false and untrue advertising
    

[Browse by APEC Member Economies] [Browse by Subject Categories] [Home]