Competition Policies/Laws


Suggestions and Judgments for The Government in 2000

  1. In case of stock selling of a government institutional, KPPU gave an advice that institution should not sell those shares to one of business actors, in order to prevent dominant position.
  2. In the matter of government's plan to do price fixing in solar fuel, Commission sent a letter to Minister of Energy and Mineral Resources. The follow-up of that correspond, on February 2, 2001, Commission met The Director General of Oil and Natural Gas to discuss policy plan.
  3. Presumed that ORGANDA did cartel practice in taxi fare in Jakarta, Commission arranged a public hearing with interrelated parties. From that public hearing, Commission suggest Organda to stop that cartel practice.

Suggestions and Judgments for The Government in 2001

  1. In case of solar fuel price discrimination, KPPU send a letter to Minister of Energy and Mineral Resources and advice to give attention before decided to implement the regulation
  2. In the matter of taxi tariff, KPPU send a letter to transportation and telecommunication ministry and suggest to overview and give attention to business actors therefore they cannot break the law no 5/1999
  3. In the matter of price fixing by INACA, KPPU withdraw the INACA authority and deregulated the flight industry regulation

Suggestions and Judgments for The Government in 2002

  1. In case of using Halal label or sticker policy, KPPU suggest Religion Department to use another approach to provide information about halal labelization on a product and involved printing business actor by transparent tender
  2. In the matter of non economical city bus price fixing, KPPU suggest the land transportation organization to give attention about city bus transportation tariff which relevant with law no 5/1999

Suggestions and Judgments for The Government in 2003

  1. In case of container loading, KPPU suggest the government to revised clausal or adjust the agreement with law no. 5/1999
  2. In the matter of retirement credit distribution in Center Java, KPPU suggest to revised the agreement and open market for bank in Center Java to organized the credit distribution
  3. In case of government plan to floor pricing the economy air transportation, KPPU advice transportation and telecommunication department to continue the air transportation pricing regulation without use floor pricing or reference tariff
  4. In case of film distribution in Makassar, KPPU suggest the mayor of Makassar to withdraw the agreement
  5. In the matter of electricity demand side management program, KPPU suggest PT. PLN to withdraw the agreement
  6. In case of development carbon black industry, KPPU suggest to Government to use import open mechanism which relevant with the regulation.
  7. In case of Indomaret minimarket in Sukabumi, KPPU suggest to PT. Indomarco Prismatama to stop their expand in traditional market. KPPU also recommend to Government to effectively realization regulation in location regulation and license open hour and social environment.
  8. In case of chicken farm partnership, KPPU suggest agrarian department to revise the clausal in agreement that potential contravene with law No. 5 / 1999.
  9. In the matter of film mechanism and working program in Makassar, KPPU suggest Makassar Mayor to complete RANTUS which relevant with law No. 5/ 1999.
  10. In case of air transportation regulation, KPPU suggest the president to maintain regulation and not using floor pricing tariff.

Suggestions and Judgments for the Government in 2004

  1. In case of sugar import, KPPU suggest government to revise the agreement in order to create import access market and decide import quota.
  2. In case of sailing national industry, KPPU advice government to decide sabotage principles, give explanation of the important of function and role between regulator and operator.
  3. In case of aerogram and bank clearance printing document cost, KPPU decide printing price fixing of aerogram and bank clearance is not valid because it's collide with the law.

Suggestions and Judgments for the Government in 2005

  1. In case of limited auction in Garut, KPPU advise to Garut regent to avoid mention the name of company which follow action process in promotion to prevent boundary and discrimination.
  2. In the matter of labor insurance, KPPU suggest government to withdraw and change the agreement and adopt competition value in insurance labor program.
  3. In case of telecommunication sector regulation, KPPU suggest the government to final duopoly policy, interconnection arrangement, vertical integration, and telecommunication independent regulation institution, conflict of interest double official, licensing modern implementation, communication technology innovation regulation, and privatization and merger communication regulation.
  4. Suggest to law and human right ministry to complete license in interrelated with status and business activity of PT. Interteknis Suryaterang.
  5. Suggest to capital investment coordination institution to complete license which interrelated with status and business activity
  6. In case of earthquake risk insurance, KPPU suggest withdrawing clausal that lead to monopoly and trust.
  7. In case of electricity regulation, KPPU suggest to formulate one clausal in regulation interrelated with law No. 5 / 1999.
  8. In case of labor restitution transportation, KPPU advice labor and transmigrate minister to withdraw the agreement of koperasi resignation in procurement and labor restitution transportation.
  9. In the matter of territorial government property insurance, KPPU suggest to reevaluate the agreement.
  10. In the matter of material government procurement in north Sumatera, KPPU suggest to revise territorial regulation and change clausal to open market for business actor.
  11. In case of monopoly in printing and stationary procurement in north Sumatera, KPPU suggest government to revise the regulation.
  12. In the matter of demand of PT. AGB ICE & FISHERIES to monopolize mango export, KPPU suggest not to granted monopoly right.

Suggestions and Judgments for the Government in 2006

  1. In case of one association boundary potential to emerge unfair business competition, such as:
    1. Market entry barrier due to the regulation order possession of profession certificate from one typical organization
    2. Business appraiser discrimination potency if profession management organize by one organization
    3. Many kinds of tender will emerge between business appraiser profession member

    KPPU gave an advice to revise profession appraise certification policy substation and change clausal of MAPPI designation as the only one profession appraise certification.

  2. In case of the limited of business factor to print blank citizen document will emerge dissatisfaction from the business factor because of the untransparent and accountable of election process, KPPU advice department of internal affairs of Republic of Indonesia to revise selection process

  3. In case of territory regulation of salt procurement regulation and circulation in North Sumatra province that will emerge
    1. Unconformity between Government Center policy and Government Territory policy about salt standard material and unwashed salt material regulation will emerge market barrier certain business factor
    2. Salt test duplication which enter to North Sumatera will emerge high cost economy potential, tender potential in test laboratory designation and dominant position abuse from salt national committee

    KPPU give a suggestion to erase the entire entry barrier for business actor and salt quality supervision by Salt National Committee should be boundary to avoid abuse dominant position and collusion

  4. KPPU send a letter to Bekasi Mayor about unfair business competition on medical instruments in Bekasi hospital and suggest to organize material and goods procurement in territorial working unit

  5. KPPU send a letter about Bank Indonesia's planning to apply shareholder controlling more than 1 (one) bank in one ownership boundary regulation to Bank Indonesia governor and inform that the regulation not contradiction to the law no. 5/1999