apec1.gif (1822 bytes)Decisions of Administrative or Quasi-judicial Agencies - Other Deceptive or Obviously Unfair Conducts-2007

  1. Far EasTone Telecommunications Co., Ltd. violated Articles 21 and 24 of the Fair Trade Law by issuing untrue news release and comparison advertisement of telecommunications plans
  2. YOYO Marketing Co., Ltd. was complained for violating the Fair Trade Law by using identical or similar appearance and symbol of another's product to sell "PROGEN YOYO Diaper"
  3. Fuhwa Commercial Bank Co. Ltd. violated Article 24 of the Fair Trade Law by not providing two types of housing loan schemes, "discharge at any time" and "restrict the period of discharge," for the borrower’s choices without restraints at the time of the conclusion of the agreement. As it relied on its dominant position for its obviously unfair act, the act was sufficient to affect trading order.
  4. MSSCORPS Co. Ltd., TMSCORPS Co. Ltd., Integrated Service Technology Inc. And Pu Shih To Delicacy Co. Ltd. were complained for violating the Fair Trade Law by stealing business secrets and helped the former employees avoid the non-compete clause
  5. Fuhwa Commercial Bank Co. Ltd. violated Article 24 of the Fair Trade Law by not providing two types of housing loan schemes, "discharge at any time" and "restrict the period of discharge," for the borrower’s choices without restraints at the time of the conclusion of the agreement. As it relied on its dominant position for its obviously unfair act, the act was sufficient to affect trading order.
  6. Gsharp Corporation Taiwan Branch violated Article 24 of the Fair Trade Law by publishing comparison advertisement to sell repellent products
  7. Deltamac (Taiwan) Co. Ltd. violated law by improperly holding the contracts after it and the rental enterprises entered into the Agreements; this obviously unfair act was sufficient to affect market order
  8. Camangi Corporation was complained for violating the Fair Trade Law by improperly notifying or issuing warning letters to the trading counterparts of the competitor
  9. Hueia Yeha Enterprise Co., Ltd. was complained for violating Articles 20 and 24 of the Fair Trade Law by selling foot massagers (HY-19934)
  10. Uni-President Enterprises Corporation, Wei Chuan Corp. and Kuang Chuan Dairy Co., Ltd. violated the Fair Trade Law by simultaneously raising sales prices of fresh milk
  11. Chinfon Commercial Bank Co. Ltd. violated the Fair Trade Law by requiring the borrower to conform to the equivocal general clause of law. It was an obviously unfair act sufficient to affect the trade order
  12. Yi-Xiang Construction Co. Ltd. violated the Fair Trade Law for false presale real estate property advertisement of its "Jia-Xing Park" construction project contracts

[Browse by APEC Member Economies] [Browse by Subject Categories] [Home]