apec1.gif (1822 bytes)Decisions of Administrative or Quasi-judical Agencies - 1998

  1. Deceptive acts engaged in by Chie Mao Construction Co., Ltd. that were sufficient to adversely affect the trading order
  2. Improper collection of domain name fee by Taiwan Network Information Center
  3. A likelihood of impediment to fair competition caused by Hong Ling Chiao through inducing the trading counterparts of her competitors to transact with her by offering them free gifts
  4. "Chin Yuan" trademark owner Hwu Chen-Jin's violation of Article 24 of the Fair Trade Law by issuing warning letters sufficient to adversely affect the trading order
  5. Violation of the Fair Trade Law by Hung Ch'i International Co., Ltd.
  6. Violation of Article 24 of the Fair Trade Law by Bank of America NT&SA for failure to specify the interest rate in its loan agreement with its trading counterparts
  7. Violation of Article 21 of the Fair Trade Law by Shuang Ho Lien Enterprise Co., Ltd. for false and misleading presentation or indication
  8. Violation of the Fair Trade Law and the Supervisory Regulation of Multi-level Sales by Chainsome International Corp.
  9. Violation of the Fair Trade Law and the Supervisory Regulations of Multi-level Sales by Vastworld Trading Co., Ltd.
  10. Violation of Article 21(1) of the Fair Trade Law by What's Music International Incorporated for giving false and untrue and misleading presentation in a newspaper advertisement regarding prizes
  11. Violation of the Fair Trade Law by several government agencies for requiring the type of vehicles that could be used to bid for a contract to supply compactor-style waste disposal vehicles be imported and fully pre-packaged
  12. Violation of the Fair Trade Law by Dynalab Inc. for the sending of a letter warning of a patent infringement
  13. Violation of the Fair Trade Law by Kaohsiung City Taxi Radio Station Association for concerted action of price fixing
  14. Ten Comfort Corporation engaged in acts of interference by stating at the distribution channels of competitors that their thermal compress infringed on patent rights.
  15. Alleged violation of the Fair Trade Law by Tong-Fu Jewelry Shop for failing to sufficiently disclose the method of price calculation; alleged violation of the Fair Trade Law by Taipei Jewelers' Association for fixing the method of price calculation.
  16. Violation of the Fair Trade Law by companies including Ti Hwei Co., Ltd. for maintaining resale price and unduly shifting risks of operation to trading counterparts
  17. Violation of the Fair Trade Law by twelve Thai shrimp vendors including Hsu Ch'ung-min for lowering Thai shrimp purchasing prices
  18. Violation of the Fair Trade Law and the Supervisory Regulation of Multi-level Sales by Asia Leching International Co., Ltd.
  19. Violation of the Fair Trade Law by Best Shine Nutrition Co., Ltd. for counterfeiting another person's symbol that is commonly known to the relevant public
  20. Violation of the Supervisory Regulation of Multi-level Sales by China Nikken Co., Ltd.
  21. False advertising on signboard by Lien Fa Bicycle Shop

  22. Violation of the Fair Trade Law by Shang Ming Media Company for false advertising of compact disc products

  23. Violation of the Fair Trade Law by Kao K'un Construction Co., Ltd. for false advertising the pre-sale of the "Tung Cheng" housing project

  24. False representation and false advertising by Shu Er Pao Enterprise Co., Ltd. in violation of the Fair Trade Law

  25. Ten pre-mixed concrete companies in Ilan were accused of a concerted act to gain a monopoly

  26. Violation of Paragraph 1, Article 21 of the Fair Trade Law by Tung Ya Cable Television Ltd., Co. for false advertising
  27. False advertising in connection with the release of compact discs by Hsing Lai Limited
  28. Unfair competition of Sijia Trading Company Limited for issuing warning letters in connection with alleged patent infringement
  29. Yung T'ang Construction Co., Ltd.'s pre-sale house false advertising
  30. Violation of the Fair Trade Law by Chin Guare Industry Co., Ltd. for labeling false, untrue and misleading representation on the product packaging
  31. Chen Gen CATV accused of seeking to attract viewers through improper price-cutting behavior
  32. Alleged violation of the Fair Trade Law regarding Directorate General of Posts of the Ministry of Transportation and Communications’s purchase tender for postal counter computer system equipment
  33. Hua Hsin Hang Co. (the winning bidder on the "China Petroleum Project to Relocate Elevated Gas Pipes Running Into Box Culverts, Embankments, and Bridges") alleged to have used licenses borrowed from Chi Ku Co. and Tao Hsin Co. in the bidding process
  34. Violation of the Fair Trade Law by Han Kung Construction Limited Company for false advertising
  35. Hui Lan Communications Co. Ltd. (the respondent) was allegedly engaged in deceptive promotional activity featuring "gifts with subscription," which could have adversely affected trading order
  36. Lien Ch'eng Real Estate violated the Fair Trade Law for misleading its trading counterparts through incomplete disclosure of trading information
  37. Nan Yi Bookstore violated the Fair Trade Law by engaging in discriminatory treatment and imposition of improper restrictions [on the activities of its trading counterparts] while selling elementary school reference books
  38. The RCA Thomson Licensing Corporation was complained for its violation of the Fair Trade Law by improperly collecting royalties
  39. Shin Lung Natural Gas Co., Ltd. was complained for its abuse of market position by improperly determining the fees for natural gas pipe laying work
  40. Yuan Ching Cram School located in Tainan City violated the Fair Trade Law by accepting a receipt for tuition paid to another supplementary school as a setoff against its own tuition (tuition setoff) and offering an additional discount of NT$ 5,000
  41. Collection of basic fees during cutoff periods as required by for in the Business Charters of Taiwan Power Company and Taiwan Water Supply Corporation
  42. Chiyuan Cable and Telecommunication Corp. Ltd. violated the Fair Trade Law for incorporating untrue notes into channel purchase contract stating that it represented all cable system operators in the southern district of Miaoli
  43. Hai Shan Cable Broadcasting Company and T'ai Feng Cable Broadcasting Enterprise violated the Fair Trade Law for taking concerted actions
  44. Le Yang Enterprise Co., Ltd. violated the Fair Trade Law for sending letters of notice and issuing public notices
  45. Mi Ya Le Company violated the fair Trade Law for false advertising on Mi Ssu Feng fruit and vegetable detoxifier
  46. Nutricia (H.K.) Ltd., Taiwan Branch violated the Fair Trade Law for its act of publishing comparative advertisement
  47. The Private Hospitals & Clinics Association (PHCA) violated the Fair Trade Law by developing a consulting fee schedule for medical record inquiring by insurance Institutions
  48. Six cram schools in Kaohsiung violated the Fair Trade Law for their concerted action in prescribing standards for collecting tuition
  49. Alleged violation of the Fair Trade Law by Somchen Co. Ltd, a household production agency
  50. Violation of Article 14 of the Fair Trade Law by Concerted Bidders in the Taiwan Provincial Water Company's Procurement of Liquid Chlorine
  51. Hsin Pin Tao Cable Distribution System Co., Ltd., Feng Meng Television Engineering Co., Ltd., and K'e Ning Mass Media Co., Ltd. violated the Fair Trade Law for their regional program distributorship agreement
  52. Hsin Shih Po Cable Broadcast System Corp. violated the Fair Trade Law for its acquisition of regional distributorship for certain channels/programs in Chungho and Yungho
  53. He Wei Broadcasting Co., Ltd. violated the Fair Trade Law for withholding price information of programs
  54. Jih Ch'ang Leather Goods Development Co., Ltd. filed a complaint against Chia Ssu K'e Industrial Co., Ltd. for the latter's alleged violation of the Fair Trade Law
  55. Louis Vuitton Malletier and Taiwan Lu Wei filed a complaint against Yang Shih Chung for counterfeiting LOUIS VUITTON and other three trademarks in violation of the Fair Trade Law
  56. Tung Sen Multimedia Co., Ltd., New Taipei Cable TV System, Chin Pin Tao Cable TV System, and Lien Ch'un Cable TV System in Taipei, and Chen Tao Cable TV System in Hsin Chu violated the Fair Trade Law for their failure to apply for combination approval
  57. Ta Hsin Advertising Company violated Article 24 of the Fair Trade Law for its failure to disclose to its clients the option to use "Letter of Offer", provided by the Ministry of Interior, as an alternative to the requirement of negotiation deposit
  58. Young Titan Enterprise Co., Ltd.'s was complained for its false representations on the age and origin of the imported alcoholic beverages
  59. Changhua County Real Estate Agents Association violated the Fair Trade Law for specifying service fee standards and maintaining such fee standards by expelling those who did not comply with the fee standards
  60. Complaint against Chiu T'ai Technology Co. Ltd. and a Tainan City-based cable broadcasting system operator for jointly cutting off the [broadcast] signals to hotels
  61. Alleged violation of Articles 20 and 24 of the Fair Trade Law by Batman International Trade Corporation
  62. Best Leading Lady International Beauticians Ltd. failed to submit relevant information without justifiable reasons, within the time limit in the course of a Fair Trade Commission investigation regarding its alleged violation of the Fair Trade Law
  63. Violation of the Fair Trade Law by China Engineering Consultants Inc. for specifying use of certain product brands for the stretchable aperture construction of the CKS Airport Phase-2 Project
  64. Complaints against four enterprises, including Chung Hwa Computer Center, for the violation of the Fair Trade Law by their comparative advertisement for fax reception/transfer service
  65. Complaint against Pacific Construction Company regarding its false statements in sales advertisements and deceptive/obviously unfair acts relating the "Pacific Commercial Center"
  66. Alleged violation of the Fair Trade Law by Fu Yi Shan Co., Ltd. for copying the external appearance of another person's product
  67. Violation of the Fair Trade Law and the Regulation Governing Multi-level Sales by Giraffe International Co., Ltd.
  68. Complaint against Architect Ch'en Hui-hsiung for deliberately stalling the screening of ceiling materials to be used for the new project of the MOTC Telecommunications Service Complex, with the intent to benefit a certain material supplier
  69. Complaint by Ares International Corporation against MTi Abraxsys System Inc., an American company, for violating Articles 22 and 24 of the Fair Trade Law
  70. Alleged false advertisement by Ken Lai Construction Co., Ltd. for its T'ien Mu Embassy Project
  71. Violation of the Fair Trade Law by Zsin Products Inc. for its advertisement of "Ni Tai Li Er Massaging Bras"
  72. Alleged violation of the Fair Trade Law by Miller Brewing Company [respondent] for exploiting another person's work result
  73. Complaint filed by Chin Yuan Food Co., Ltd. against Cheng Tzung T'ang Chin Yuan Enterprise Co., Ltd. for violation of the Fair Trade Law by copying its service mark of "Chin Yuan Pork Chop" and making untrue representations in its advertisements for "Cheng Tzung T'ang Chin Yuan Pork Chop"
  74. Violation of the Fair Trade Law by the Department of Housing and Urban Development, Taiwan Provincial Government
  75. False labeling on video cassettes, "Alien" series, sold by the EAC Consumer Products Ltd. APS (a company of Denmark), Chinese Taipei Branch
  76. Bidders were allegedly in violation of the Fair Trade Law in bidding for the "Environmental Protection Detecting System" construction tendered by the Refinery Institute of the China Petroleum Corp.
  77. Violation of the Fair Trade Law [FTL] by Farcent Enterprise Co., Ltd. [respondent] for obviously sending attorney letters alleging patent infringement
  78. Hualien Cable TV Distribution System's [respondent] advertisements contained false, untrue and misleading presentations and symbols
  79. Hung Ming Metal Company [complainant] filed a complaint against Sucoot Co., Ltd. [respondent] for violating the Fair Trade Law by sending, in its name and in that of its patent attorney, warning letters alleging patent infringement
  80. Complaint against Jih Hsuan Trading Limited Company for selling wine of untrue labeling
  81. Violation of the Fair Trade Law by Lien Hua P'u T'i Co., Ltd. for falsely advertising its "Healthy Environmental Protection Incense"
  82. Violation of Article 24 of the Fair Trade Law [FTL] by PresiCarre Corp. [respondent] for abusing its advantageous market position to exclude the suppliers from competition thereby adversely affecting the trading order
  83. Alleged violation of the Fair Trade Law by several cement companies for jointly limiting supply quantity in order to increase prices
  84. Violation of the Fair Trade Law by Shin Nan Petroleum Gas Co., Ltd.
  85. Suspected violation of the Fair Trade Law [FTL] by the Certified Public Accountants [CPA] Associations of Taiwan Province, Taipei and Kaohsiung cities [respondents], which jointly specified uniform fee standards and demanded all their members abide by those standards, and by the Taipei Municipal Certified Public Accountants Association [the TCPAA] for its decision to send a rectification demand letter to a member who failed to abide by the fee standards for services provided to a state-owned enterprise
  86. Ex officio investigation by this Commission on the violation of Article 24 of Fair Trade Law by "T'ung Er Bread" shop.
  87. Violation of the Fair Trade Law by Umax Data Systems, Inc. for circulating false information
  88. Violation of the Fair Trade Law by the Department of Housing and Urban Development, Taiwan Provincial Government
  89. Wu Ling Shan Chuang sewage treatment project's [Project] tying of specifications in violation of the Fair Trade Law
  90. National Taiwan University Hospital and National Cheng Kung University Hospital were complained for inviting bids for procurement of drugs in violation of the Fair Trade Law
  91. Provincial Government Department of Transportation sent a letter inquiring whether the Kaohsiung Harbor Bureau's liberalizing operation of the vessel water supply business to one private firm without consideration of zoning and classification, is in accordance with the Fair Trade Law
  92. Citicorp and Traveler's Group's application for approval of their combination 06/24/99

  93. Applications to take concerted action to quarry and decide production output along the Chuo Shui Stream filed separately by ten joint management companies, including Siha Co., Ltd.

  94. Approval of enterprise combination jointly applied for by Yulon Motor Co., Ltd. and China Motor Co., Ltd. for their combination with R.O.C. Spicer Ltd. [Spicer]

  95. Approval for the combination of UNI Airways Corporation, Great China Airlines, Ltd., and Taiwan Airways Corporation

  96. Approval for the combination of Save & Save Company Limited and Taiwan Sugar Corporation Limited

  97. Approval of combination applied by ICI Taiwan Ltd., Quest International Taiwan Ltd., National Starch & Chemical Ltd., Taiwan

  98. Approval of combination, the application was filed jointly by Ting Chieu Trading Corporation, Kang Sheng Investment Corporation Ltd., Kang Fa Investment Corporation Ltd., and Kang Ching Corporation Ltd. for combination with Wei Chuan Food Industrial Co., Ltd.

  99. Approval of concerted action, the application of which was filed by Taiwan Vegetable Oil Manufacturers Association for purchasing soybeans from Paraguay in line with the government policy

  100. Application for approval of combination by President Enterprises Corporation Limited and 21Century Quickly Restaurant Service Company Limited

  101. Combination of Chuan-lien CATV Co., Ltd. and Zhin-kwan CATV Co., Ltd.

  102. Application by Ping Tung County Gravel Quarry Business Association on behalf of seventy and more gravel businesses in the Kao P'ing River quarry area for exemption approval as per Article 14 of the Fair Trade Law, of their concerted action to form an unified management company

  103. Approval of the combination of Hesong Corporation Ltd. and Song Hsin Corporation Ltd.

  104. Application for approval of combination through the purchase by Seagram C.I. (Canada) of 75% of the shares of PolyGram (Holland) which changes the controlling or subordinate relationships among related enterprises in Chinese Taipei

  105. Supplemental application for approval of concerted action filed by Sumitomo Electric Ind., Ltd. based on prior approval

  106. Application by Ruentex Enterprises Group Ltd. and Trans Asia Development Ltd. for combination of enterprises

  107. The Taoyuan District Court requested the FTC determine whether or not Apollo Story Whisky violated Fair Trade Law Article 24 by imitating Suntory Whisky02/01/01
  108. Special research and analysis for promoting the competition of the petrol station market

  109. Recommendation to the MOEA on amendments to the Regulations Governing the Establishment of Gas Stations

  110. Kaohsiung District Prosecutors' Office, prosecuting Chuang Ping-huang and others for allegedly collaborating in bid rigging for the contract of the Taichung Air Force Warehouse, requested for the opinion of the Fair Trade Commission regarding whether the act involved concerted actions prohibited by the Fair Trade Law

  111. Taiwan Sugar Company Hsin Ying Plant [inquirer] purchase of polyacrylic resins

  112. Inquiry by the Ministry of Economic Affairs (MOEA) regarding whether or not it is in violation of the Fair Trade Law for the MOEA, as per the instruction of the Cabinet, to appoint CETRA as the operator of the exhibition building situated in the TWTC Nankang Exhibition Complex, the construction of which is currently under planning

  113. Civil aviation transportation enterprises' joint transportation acts after the amendment of the Civil Aviation Law suspected of being concerted actions 06/24/99

  114. Corrective measures regarding construction firm's request that pre-sold housing unit buyers sign a promissory note as security

  115. Administrative settlement between Matra Transport Corporation and the Fair Trade Commission for Matra's alleged violation of the Fair Trade Law

  116. Compensation by photo developer for damage to or loss of customer film

[Browse by APEC Member Economies][Browse by Subject Categories] [Home]
[2011] [2010] [2009] [2008] [2007] [2006] [2005] [2004] [2003] [2002] [2001] [2000] [1999] [1997][1996] [1995][1994] [1993][1992]