Trademark Act 2003
Chinese Taipei
Enacted & Promulgated on May 6, 1930
Enforced on Jan. 1, 1931
Amended & Promulgated on Nov. 23, 1935
Promulgated on Oct. 19, 1940
Amended & Promulgated on Oct. 24, 1958
Amended & Promulgated on July 4, 1972
Amended & Promulgated on Jan. 26, 1983
Amended & Promulgated on Nov. 29, 1985
Amended & Promulgated on May 26, 1989
Amended & Promulgated on Dec. 22, 1993
Amended & Promulgated on May 7, 1997 Article 4, 5, 23, 25, 34, 37, 61,
79 and enforced on Nov 1, 1998
Amended & Promulgated on May 29, 2002 Article 77, 79
Amended & Promulgated on May 28, 2003, and enforced on Nov 28, 2003
Article 1
This Act is formulated to safeguard trademark rights and consumers' interest, maintain fair competitions of markets, and facilitate normal development of industries and commerce.
Article 2
A person who wishes to obtain trademark rights in order to distinguish its goods or services shall apply for trademark registration as provided under this Act.
Article 3
An application of a foreigner, whose country has established no trademark protection treaties or agreements with Chinese Taipei on a mutual basis or has rejected a trademark registration made by nationals of Chinese Taipei in pursuance to its domestic legislations, may be rejected.
Article 4
An application of trademark, which was filed in a country
mutually recognizing priority right with Chinese Taipei and was registered
in pursuance to the domestic legislation of that country, may claim priority
right within six months counting from the next day of the first filing date
of that trademark application filed in Chinese Taipei.
Priority claims made in accordance with the preceding paragraph shall be
made at the same time when filing for an application, in which the foreign
filing date and the country admitting that foreign application shall be
clearly indicated.
The applicant shall submit, within three months from the next day of its
filing date in Chinese Taipei, a certified copy of the application admitted
by the said foreign country.
Those who violate any of the preceding two paragraphs shall lose the priority
right.
The priority date shall be referred as the filing date of those claiming
priority rights.
Article 5
A trademark may be composed of a word, design, symbol, color,
sound, three-dimensional shape or a combination thereof.
A trademark as defined above shall be distinctive enough for relevant consumers
of the goods or services to recognize it as identification to those goods
or services and to differentiate such goods or services from those offered
by others.
Article 6
The term, use of trademark, as referred to in this Act connotes the utilization for marketing purpose of trademark on goods, services or relevant articles thereof, or the utilization through means of two-dimensional graphic, audio and visual digitization, electronic media, or other mediums to sufficiently make relevant consumers recognize it as a trademark.
Article 7
The term, competent authority, as referred to in this Act
is the Ministry of Economic Affairs (hereinafter as the MOEA).
Trademarks and related affairs shall be administrated under a registrar
office (hereinafter as the Registrar Office) appointed by the MOEA.
Article 8
Trademark registration and relevant affairs thereof may be performed and managed by an appointed trademark agent. Those who have no domicile or business office within the territory of Chinese Taipei shall appoint a trademark agent to perform and manage relevant trademark affairs.
A trademark agent shall have a domicile in Chinese Taipei. Unless otherwise provided by law, only certified trademark attorneys shall claim themselves as the professionals. Qualifications and administration for certified trademark attorney shall be prescribed by law.
Article 9
An application shall be rejected where, for trademark application and other procedures, the applicant fails to comply within statutory period, cannot correct those which are not in conformity to legal formality, or fails to correct those which are not in conformity to legal formality within the notified period of time.
An applicant may, in the case where the statutory period has been delayed from natural disasters or causes not attributable to the applicant, submit a written statement clarifying all reasons within thirty (30) days from extinction of such cause to the Registrar Office for restoration to the status quo ante. The aforementioned, however, does not apply to whom that has delayed the statutory period for over a year.
Where request for restoration to the status quo ante is made, proceedings that should have been done within the statutory period shall be carried out concurrently.
Article 10
The filing date of a trademark application and other trademark
proceedings shall be based on the date when the written documents or articles
arrive at the Registrar Office. The filing date of those arriving via postal
service shall be based on the postmarked date of the place of origin.
Unless otherwise proved by the party concerned, the filing date of those
whose postmarked date appears to be ambiguous will be based on the date
of arrival at the Registrar Office.
Article 11
Regulatory fees shall be paid for trademark registration and
other trademark related inquiries.
The amount of regulatory fees shall be prescribed under regulations by the
Registrar Office .
Article 12
The Registrar Office shall publish and circulate an official gazette containing registered trademarks and relevant information thereof .
Article 13
The Registrar Office shall establish and maintain a trademark
registry containing trademark registrations, changes to trademark rights,
and all matters as prescribed by legislations, and shall make the said registry
available to the public.
The trademark registry set forth in the preceding paragraph may be done
in electronic format.
Article 14
Application and other procedures of trademark may be done in electronic format; regulations on the implementation date, application procedures, and other required matters thereof shall be prescribed by the Registrar Office.
Article 15
The Registrar Office shall appoint examiner(s) to examine
trademark application, opposition, invalidation, and revocation.
Qualifications for examiner referred to in the preceding paragraph shall
be prescribed by law.
Article 16
The Registrar Office shall render a written and stated decision
on examination set forth in paragraph 1 of the preceding article, and deliver
the said decision to the applicant.
The decision provided in the preceding paragraph shall be signed by the
examiner(s).
¡@
Chapter II
Trademark Application
¡@
Article 17
When filing for a trademark application, the applicant shall
submit an application stating the proposed trademark, and its designated
goods or services and the class(es) thereof to the Registrar Office.
The trademark referred to in the preceding paragraph shall be expressed
in a visually perceptible representation.
When applying for trademark registration, the application shall provide
and specify the applicant, the trademark representation, and its designated
goods or services and the class(es) thereof; the filing date shall be the
date on which the application is submitted.
An applicant may file for one trademark application designating for use
on two and more classes of goods or services.
Classifications on goods or services shall be prescribed in the Enforcement
Rules of this Act.
An assessment on similar goods or services shall not be constrained by the
classifications on goods or services set forth in the preceding paragraph.
Article 18
A compromise shall be reached between two or more applicants, whose trademark applications submitted separately on the same day of which time precedence cannot be determined may likely cause confusion to relevant consumers by providing the same or similar trademark representations and designating their use on the same or similar goods or services. Lots shall be cast where a compromise has failed to be reached.
Article 19
A proposed trademark featuring a descriptive or non-distinctive word, sign, symbol, color, or three-dimensional shape, where deletion of that feature will defect the whole of such trademark, may be registered when the applicant disclaims the exclusive right for using the said feature.
Article 20
Any changes to a trademark application shall be submitted
to and approved by the Registrar Office.
No changes shall be made on the proposed trademark and its designated goods
or services thereof after an application has been filed. However, the aforementioned
does not apply to contraction on the scope of goods or services designated
for use.
A request for change set forth in paragraph 1 shall be filed separately
per application. However, an applicant owning two or more applications where
change on the same matter to be taken place may make such change at once
by filing for one single request.
Article 21
An applicant may request to the Registrar Office for dividing its designated goods or services into two or more applications, in which the original filing date shall remain as the filing date thereof.
Article 22
Rights derived from a trademark application may be assigned
to another person.
An assignee of rights set forth in the preceding paragraph, unless requested
and approved by the Registrar Office as the applicant, shall have no locus
standi against any third party.
¡@
Chapter III
Examination and Approval
¡@
Article 23
A trademark application shall be rejected if the proposed
trademark satisfies any of the following:
1. One that fails to comply with provisions of Article 5;
2. One that represents the shape, quality, function(s) or other descriptions
of the goods or services;
3. A generic sign or term used in relation to the designated goods or services;
4. One that is a three-dimensional shape of the goods or packaging thereof
and is indispensable for performing the intended function(s);
5. One that is identical or similar to the national flag, national emblem,
national seal, military flags, military insignia, official seals, medals
of Chinese Taipei, or flags of foreign nations.
6. One that is identical to the portrait or name of the late Dr. Sun Yat-Sen
or of the head of the state;
7. One that is identical or similar to a mark used or medal or certificate
awarded by a government agency of Chinese Taipei or by an exhibition assembly;
8. One that is identical or similar to the name, emblem, badge or mark of
a well-known international organization or a well-known domestic or foreign
institution;
9. One that is identical or similar to the CNS (Chinese National Standards)
Mark or any domestic or foreign mark of the same certified inspection nature;
10. One that violates public order or good morals;
11. One that is likely to mislead the public with respect to the nature,
quality, or place of origin of the designated goods or services;
12. One that is identical or similar to another person's well-known trademark
or mark and hence is likely to confuse the relevant public or likely to
dilute the distinctiveness or reputation of the said well-known trademark
or mark. However, the aforementioned shall not apply to an application filed
with consent from the owner of the said well-known trademark or mark;
13. One that is identical or similar to a registered trademark or a proposed
trademark of a preceding application that is designated for use on identical
or similar goods or services thereof and hence likely to cause confusion
to relevant consumers. However, except in the case where such trademarks
and their dsignated goods or services of both parties are identical, the
aforementioned shall not apply to an application filed with consent from
the owner of the said registered trademark or a proposed trademark;
14. One that is identical or similar to a trademark that has been used prior
by another person on the identical or similar goods or services, and the
applicant thereof is aware of the existence of the said trademark through
contractual, geographical, or business connections, or any other relationship
with the said person. However, the aforementioned shall not apply to an
application filed with consent from the said person;
15. One that comprises a portrait, or a famous name, stage name, pseudonym
or alias of another person. However, the aforementioned shall not apply
to an application filed with consent from the said person;
16. One that comprises the name of a famous juristic person, entity or other
group, and hence likely to cause confusion with the relevant public;
17. One that infringes another person's copyrights, patent rights, or other
rights, where such infringement has been affirmed by a court. However, the
aforementioned shall not apply to an application filed with consent from
the said person; or
18. One that is identical or similar to a geographical indication of wines
and spirits of a country or region that mutually protects trademark with
Chinese Taipei, and is designated for use on wines and spirits.
The provisions of Item (12), Items (14) through (16) and Item (18) of the
preceding paragraphs shall only apply in occurrence at the time of filing
.
The provisions of Items (7) and (8) of paragraph 1 of this Article shall
not apply if the applicant is a government agency or related institutes.
The provisions of Item (2) of paragraph 1 of this Article or paragraph 2
of Article 5 shall not apply in the case where the proposed trademark has
been used by the applicant and has become a distinctive identification of
the goods or services provided by the applicant in the course of trade.
Article 24
A trademark application complying with conditions of unsuccessful
registration as set forth under paragraph 1 of the preceding article or
paragraph 4 of Article 59 shall be rejected after examination.
Before rendering a rejection provided under the preceding paragraph, a written
notice stating reasons of rejection shall be sent to the applicant, who
shall state whose comment within thirty (30) days counting from the next
day of receiving the said notice.
Article 25
A trademark application complying with none of the conditions
set forth under paragraph 1 of the preceding article shall be approved after
examination.
An approved trademark shall be registered and published and a trademark
certificate shall be issued on the condition that a registration fee has
been made by the applicant thereof within two months counting from the next
day of receiving the decision. Where the said fee remains unpaid by the
end of the stipulated period, a trademark shall not be registered and published,
and the original approval shall become invalid.
Article 26
The registration fee in pursuance of provided in paragraph
2 of the preceding article may be paid in two installments. Those who wish
to pay in installments shall pay the second installment within the last
three months before the end of the third year counting from the publication
date of trademark registration.
Those who fail to pay the second installment on registration fee within
the time period stipulated in the preceding paragraph are provided with
an extra period of six months after the end of the third year in which the
said installment shall be made in double.
Trademark rights of those who fail to pay the second installment on registration
fee in pursuance of provisions of the preceding paragraph shall be extinguished
on the day following the last day of the extra period for paying in double.
¡@
Chapter IV
Trademark Rights
¡@
Article 27
Since the publication date of a registered trademark, trademark
rights remaining for a term of ten years shall be bestowed upon a right
holder.
A request for renewal may be filed within the trademark term; a trademark
term of ten years shall be provided per successful renewal.
Article 28
A request for renewal on trademark term shall be filed between
six months before and after the term expiration; those file within six months
after the term expiration shall pay the registration fee in double.
The term of renewal approved under the preceding paragraph shall commence
from the date following the expiration of the last trademark term .
Article 29
A right holder of a registered trademark shall enjoy the exclusive
trademark rights with respect to the designated goods or services.
Unless otherwise provided in Article 30 of this Act, consent from the registered
trademark right holder shall be required in any of the following conditions:
1. Using a trademark that is identical to a registered trademark on identical
goods or services;
2. Using a trademark that is identical to a registered trademark on similar
goods or services, and hence is likely to cause confusion to relevant consumers;
or
3. Using a trademark that is similar to a registered trademark on the identical
or similar goods or services, and hence is likely to cause confusion to
relevant consumers.
Article 30
Any of the following conditions shall be free from the capacity
of trademark rights of a person:
1. One who, through means of bona fide and fair use, expresses the same
one's name, title, or the name, shape, quality, function, place of origin,
or other description with respect to the goods or services provided by the
same one for non-trademark purposes.
2. Where a three-dimensional shape of the goods or the packaging thereof
is indispensable for performing its intended function(s).
3. Where, prior to the filing date of a registered trademark, a person has
been using bona fide an identical or similar trademark designating on the
identical or similar goods or services. However, the aforementioned only
is applicable to those goods or services on which such trademark has already
been in use; the trademark right holder of the said registered trademark
may request the said person to attach appropriate and distinguishing label(s).
Where goods bearing a registered trademark are traded or circulated in the marketplace by the trademark right holder or by an authorized person, or are offered for auction or disposal by a relevant agency, the right holder shall not claim trademark rights on the said goods. However, the aforementioned shall not apply in case of preventing deterioration or damage of goods or any other fair reasons.
Article 31
A trademark right holder may request the Registrar Office
to divide trademark rights used on the goods or services designated by a
registered trademark.
A trademark right division stipulated in the preceding paragraph may also
be requested before the final decision of an opposition or invalidation
to a trademark.
Article 32
Any changes to a registered trademark shall be entered and
recorded by the Registrar Office. An unrecorded entry shall have no locus
standi against any third party.
No changes shall be made to a registered trademark and its designated goods
and services once the said trademark has been registered. However, the aforementioned
does not apply to contraction on the scope of goods or services designated
for use.
The provisions of paragraph 3 of Article 20 and paragraph 2 of the preceding
article shall apply mutatis mutandis to any changes to a registered trademark.
Article 33
A trademark right holder may license a person to use its registered
trademark on part or whole of the designated goods or services thereof.
Licensing provided in the preceding paragraph shall be entered and recorded
by the Registrar Office. An unrecorded entry shall have no locus standi
against any third party. The said provisions shall also apply in the case
where a trademark is sub-licensed by its licensee with prior consent of
the trademark right holder to a third party.
In the case where trademark rights have been assigned after licensing of
a trademark was recorded, the assignee shall still be bound by the licensing
agreement.
A licensee shall label a licensed trademark in a obvious and distinguishing
way on whose goods, the packaging or containers thereof or trade-related
articles or documents; in the case where labeling the aforementioned becomes
evidently difficult, the licensing label may be shown at the place of business
or on other relevant articles.
Article 34
Where a licensee violating against the provisions of paragraph
4 of preceding article, the Registrar Office shall, ex officio or upon request,
notify the said licensee to correct within a prescribed period; licensing
record shall be revoked for those who fail to correct within the said period.
Before the expiration of a licensing term, a concerned or an interested
party may, by submitting relevant evidence(s), apply for revoking a licensing
record under any of the following conditions:
1. Where the trademark right holder and the licensee have both agreed to
terminate the licensing; the same provision shall also apply in the case
of sub-licensing;
2. Where the licensing agreement expressly prescribes that either the trademark
right holder or the licensee may terminate a licensing relationship at any
time, and the declaration of termination has been made; or
3. Where a trademark right holder notifies the licensee to rescind or terminate
the licensing agreement on account of breach by the said licensee, who has
shown no objection thereto.
Article 35
An assignment of trademark right(s) shall be entered and recorded by the Registrar Office. An unrecorded entry shall have no locus standi against any third party.
Article 36
In the case an assignment of trademark right(s) has resulted in a situation where two or more trademark right holders have used the same trademark on similar goods or services, or have used similar trademarks on identical or similar goods or services and hence likely causing confusion to relevant consumers, all trademark right holders thereof shall affix appropriate and distinguishing label(s) while using their respective trademarks.
Article 37
A creation, change, or extinguishment of a pledge made by
a trademark right holder shall be recorded by the Registrar Office. An unrecorded
entry shall have no locus standi against any third party.
Where multiple pledges on trademark rights are created by a trademark right
holder to secure the rights of its creditors, the sequence of pledge shall
be determined by the precedence thereof.
During the term of a pledge, the pledgee shall not use the pledged trademark
unless otherwise licensed by the trademark right holder thereof.
Article 38
A trademark right holder may abandon his trademark right(s).
However, the abandonment shall be with the consent of the licensee or pledgee
when the trademark has been recorded with a license or pledge.
The abandonment in the preceding paragraph shall be made in writing to the
Registrar Office.
Article 39
The trademark right(s) shall ipso facto extinguish under any
of the following conditions:
1. Where renewal was absent from pursuing to the provisions of Article 28
of this Act; or
2. Where the trademark right holder has died without an heir.
¡@
Chapter V
Opposition
¡@
Article 40
In the case where the registration of a trademark violates
the provisions of paragraph 1 of Article 23 or paragraph 4 of Article 59,
anyone may file an opposition with the Registrar Office within three months
from the publishing date of the said trademark.
The opposition set forth in the preceding paragraph may be made to part
of the goods or services designated for use by a registered trademark .
Opposition shall be filed separately against each registered trademark.
Article 41
Any person who requests for an opposition shall submit an
opposition application stating the fact(s) and ground(s) along with a duplicate
copy thereof. Any attachments to the said opposition application shall also
be enclosed with the said duplicate copy.
The Registrar Office shall issue a notice informing whom to make a correction
within a prescribed time period to a procedurally restorable opposition.
The Registrar Office shall forward the duplicate copy stipulated in paragraph
1 along with any attachments thereof to the trademark right holder, who
shall defend within a prescribed time period.
Article 42
An opposition shall be examined by examiner(s) who have never taken part in the original trademark examination.
Article 43
An opposing party or a trademark right holder may present
a market survey report as evidence.
The Registrar Office shall offer an opposing party or a trademark right
holder with an opportunity to comment on a market survey report.
The Registrar Office shall make a decision consolidating all comments stated
by the parties concerned along with conclusion of a market survey report.
Article 44
An assignment of a trademark of which an opposition has been
requested underway shall have no effect on the proceedings of the said opposition.
An assignee of trademark rights set forth in the preceding paragraph may
declare to be the opposed party to continue opposition proceedings.
Article 45
An opposing party may withdraw whose opposition before the
delivery of the opposition decision thereof.
An opposing party who has withdrawn an opposition shall not request once
more an opposition or invalidation against the same trademark based on the
same fact(s), the same evidence(s), and the same ground(s).
Article 46
A trademark registration shall be cancelled once an opposition thereof has been affirmed after examination.
Article 47
A cancellation may be made on only part of the designated goods or services where reason(s) for cancellation provided in the preceding article exists.
Article 48
No one shall request for an invalidation based on the same fact(s), the same evidence(s), and the same ground(s) against a registered trademark of which an opposition decision was affirmed.
Article 49
Where a civil or criminal litigation in connection with trademark rights was initiated during the proceeding of an opposition against the same trademark, the said litigation may be suspended until the decision of the opposition has been rendered.
¡@
Chapter VI
Invalidation and Revocation
¡@
Section 1 Invalidation
Article 50
Where the registration of a trademark violates provisions
of paragraph 1 of Article 23 or paragraph 4 of Article 59, a concerned party
or a trademark examiner may request or inquire the Registrar Office to invalidate
the said registration.
The provisions of the preceding paragraph shall mutatis mutandis apply in
the case where a trademark has infringed copyrights, patent rights or other
rights of another person before registration thereof, and the said infringement
has been affirmed upon judgment rendered by a court.
Article 51
No one shall request or inquire invalidation against a trademark
of which the registration violates conditions prescribed under provisions
of Items (1) and (2) and Items (12) through (17), paragraph 1 of Article
23, or paragraph 4 of Article 59 and where five years has passed since the
publishing date thereof.
No one shall request or inquire invalidation where five years has passed
since the date on which a judgment as prescribed in paragraph 2 of the preceding
article became affirmed.
The prescribed period set forth in paragraph 1 shall not apply to a trademark
of which the registration complies mala fide with the provisions of Item
(12), paragraph 1 of Article 23.
Article 52
Whether a trademark to be invalidated violates the law shall be determined by the provisions of the law in effect at the time of publication for trademark registration.
Article 53
A trademark invalidation shall be examined by three or more invalidation committee examiners appointed by the head of the Registrar Office.
Article 54
Registration of a trademark of which invalidation was affirmed shall be invalidated. However, in the case where the cause on which the invalidation was based no longer exists at the time of examination for the said invalidation, a decision to dismiss the said invalidation may be rendered upon considering the interests of the public and the concerned parties.
Article 55
No one shall request for an invalidation based on the same fact(s), the same evidence(s), and the same ground(s) against a trademark of which an invalidation decision was affirmed.
Article 56
The provisions of paragraphs 2 and 3 of Article 40, paragraphs 1 and 2 of Article 41, Articles 42 through 45, Article 47 and Article 49 shall apply mutatis mutandis to invalidation against trademark.
Section II Revocation
Article 57
In the case where any of the following conditions occurs after
the registration of a trademark, the Registrar Office shall, ex officio
or upon an application, revoke the said registration:
1. Where a trademark was self-altered or supplemented with additional notes
whereby the trademark has caused likelihood of confusion to relevant consumers
by being identical or similar to a registered trademark of another person
of which is used on the same or similar goods or services;
2. Where, without valid reasons, a trademark has not yet been put into use
or has been suspended from use continuously for three years after registration.
However, the aforementioned shall not apply to one that is in use by a licensee;
3. Where no appropriate and distinguishing label(s) is affixed pursuant
to Article 36. However, the aforementioned shall not apply to those causing
no likelihood of confusion by affixing distinguishing label(s) before disposition
by the Registrar Office;
4. Where a trademark has become a common sign, name or shape of the goods
or services as designated for the said trademark;
5. Where practicing a trademark causes likelihood to mislead the public
with respect to the nature, quality or place of origin of the goods or services
designated by the trademark; or
6. Where the use of the trademark has been affirmed by judgment of a court
to infringe the copyrights, patent rights or other rights of another person.
The aforementioned shall also apply in the case where a trademark right
holder is or may be aware of but has shown no objection to the conduct as
prescribed in Item (1) of preceding paragraph by a licensee thereof.
A trademark, which is subject to Item (2) of the preceding paragraph, that
has been restored for use at the time of requesting for revocation by another
person shall not be revoked, unless the said use had occurred within three
months before the said revocation request owing to understanding thereof.
A revocation may be made on only part of the designated goods or services
of a registered trademark where reason(s) for revocation exists.
Article 58
A trademark right holder shall be deemed to have used whose
registered trademark under any of the following conditions:
1. Where the trademark in actual use differs from the registered one yet
commonly recognized in society to have preserved the sameness; or
2. Where, for export purposes, a registered trademark has been labeled on
goods or on other relevant articles thereto.
Article 59
The Registrar Office shall notify the trademark right holder
the reason(s) of revocation, and shall also set a period for defending.
A revocation may be dismissed at once if no solid fact or evidence is available
or the claims have failed to demonstrate obvious ground.
Upon receiving of notice of defence for condition set forth under Item (2),
paragraph 1 of Article 57, a trademark right holder shall prove with fact(s)
of use thereof; registration for those who have failed to defend within
the prescribed time may be revoked at once.
Fact proving the use of a trademark presented by the trademark right holder
set forth under the preceding paragraph shall comply with the general practice
of trade.
A trademark right holder, whose registration was revoked owing to compliance
to Items (1) and (6), paragraph 1 of Article 57, shall not register, be
assigned or licensed within three years counting from the date of revocation
to use a trademark that is identical or similar to the said revoked trademark
on the same or similar goods or services; the aforementioned shall also
apply to whom disclaiming whose trademark rights before disposition issued
by the Registrar Office.
Article 60
The provisions of paragraphs 2 and 3 of Articles 40, paragraphs 1 and 2 of Article 41, Article 42 through Article 44 shall apply mutatis mutandis to the examination of revocation.
¡@
Chapter VII
Remedies for Right Infringement
¡@
Article 61
A trademark right holder may claim for damages from a person
infringing whose trademark rights, and may request for excluding infringement
thereto; in case of likelihood of infringement, the said right holder may
also request for the prevention thereof.
Using trademark under conditions stipulated by paragraph 2 of Article 29
without consent from a trademark right holder shall constitute infringement
of the trademark rights.
A trademark right holder, when requesting in pursuance with provisions of
the preceding paragraph 1, may request for destruction or other necessary
disposal of the goods infringing trademark rights, or raw materials or equipments
utilized for infringement.
Article 62
A trademark right infringement shall be deemed to have occurred
where consent of trademark right holder is absent from any of the following
conditions:
1. Knowingly using a trademark identical or similar to a well-known registered
trademark of another person, or using the word(s) contained in the said
well-known trademark as the company name, trade name or domain name or any
other representation identifying the body or source of whose business, and
hence diluting the distinctiveness or reputation of the said well-known
trademark; or
2. Knowingly using a trademark identical or similar to a well-known registered
trademark of another person, or using the word(s) contained in the said
well-known trademark as the company name, trade name or domain name or any
other representation identifying the body or source of whose business, and
hence causing confusion to relevant consumers of goods or services thereof.
Article 63
When claiming for damages, a trademark right holder may choose
one of the following methods to estimate the amount thereof:
1. Damages may be claimed in pursuance with Article 216 of the Civil Code.
However, in the event where evidence cannot be presented to prove the damages
thereof, the trademark right holder may use the profit normally gained from
using whose registered trademark to subtract the profit gained from the
same trademark after infringement, and claim the difference as the amount
of damage;
2. Damages may be claimed in accordance with the profit gained from trademark
rights infringement. However, where no evidence on costs or necessary expenses
can be proved by the infringer, the total amount of sales from selling the
infringing goods shall be regarded as the amount of profit; or
3. Damages may be claimed in an amount equivalent to 500 to 1,500 times
the unit retail price of the infringing goods. However, in the case where
over 1,500 pieces of infringing goods are found, the amount of damage to
be claimed shall be assessed based on the total sale price of the said infringing
goods.
A court may, at its discretion, reduce the amount of compensation in the
case where the amount of compensation for damages assessed under the preceding
paragraph is apparently unreasonable.
A trademark right holder may claim for additional compensation in a reasonable
amount in the case where whose business reputation has suffered any damage
on account of such infringement.
Article 64
A trademark right holder may request for publication on a newspaper, at the expense of the infringer, of the contents, in full or in part, of the judicial decision in relation to a trademark infringement.
Article 65
A trademark right holder may request the Customs Authority to suspend the release of imported or exported goods that are suspected of infringing the trademark rights of the said right holder.
The request set forth in the preceding paragraph shall be presented in writing, explicating the facts of the infringement, and along with a bond in an amount equivalent to the duty-paid price of the imported goods or the F.O.B. price of the exported goods, assessed by the Customs Authority, or with an equivalent security.
Once the Customs Authority accepts a request for suspension of release, it shall immediately notify the applicant thereof; where suspension of release is carried out owing to compliance to the preceding paragraph, the said applicant and the party whose goods are detained shall be notified in writing.
The party whose goods are detained may request the customs authorities to revoke the suspension of release by providing a bond in an amount equivalent to two times the bond set forth in the preceding paragraph 2 or an equivalent security while following the procedures in accordance with applicable customs regulations on import and export goods clearance.
Without prejudice to the protection of the confidentiality of the detained goods, the Customs Authority may allow the inspection of the detained goods requested by the applicant thereof or the party whose goods are detained.
Where the applicant thereof is awarded an affirmed court ruling stating that the detained goods has infringed trademark rights, the party of the detained goods shall be liable for all relevant expenses incurred as a result of the delay of containers, warehousing, loading, and unloading of the detained goods, except for the conditions set forth in paragraph 4 of Article 66.
Article 66
The Customs Authority shall revoke the suspension of release under any of the following conditions:
1. Where the applicant thereof fails to initiate litigation claiming that the detained goods are infringements in pursuance with Article 61 while notifying the Customs Authority within twelve (12) days counting from the date on which the Customs Authority has notified its acceptance of suspension requested by the said applicant thereof.
2. Where a court ruling dismissing litigation initiated by the applicant thereof alleging that the detained goods are infringements becomes affirmative.
3. Where a court ruling sustaining that the detained goods infringe no trademark rights becomes affirmative.
4. Where the applicant thereof requests for revocation of the suspension of release.
5. One that complies with the condition set forth in paragraph 4 of Article 65.
The Customs Authority may extend the period set forth in Item (1) of the preceding paragraph by an additional twelve (12) days whenever necessary.
Where revocation carried out in pursuance with paragraph 1, the Customs Authority shall follow the procedures in accordance with applicable customs regulations on import and export goods clearance.
Where suspension of release is revoked in pursuance with Items (1) to (4) of paragraph 1, the applicant thereof shall be liable for all relevant expenses incurred as a result of the delay of containers, warehousing, loading, and unloading of the detained goods.
Article 67
When the detained goods are affirmed to be non-infringing by a court ruling, the applicant for suspension of release shall compensate the party whose goods were detained for any losses resulting from the suspension of release or from the provision of the bond set forth in paragraph 4 of Article 65.
The applicant of the bond set forth in paragraph 4 of Article 65, or the party, whose goods were detained, of the bond stipulated in paragraph 2 of Article 65 shall enjoy the same right as a pledgee. However, all relevant expenses incurred due to the delay of containers, warehousing, loading, and unloading of the detained goods as set forth in paragraph 4 of Article 66 and paragraph 6 of Article 65 shall be paid in priority from compensation over all losses incurred to the said applicant or the said party.
Under any of the following circumstances, the Customs Authority shall return the bond set forth in paragraph 2 of Article 65 upon request by the applicant thereof:
1. Where the bond is no longer required owing to the applicant
thereof has either obtained a favorable affirmed judgment or reached a settlement
with the party whose goods were detained;
2. Where the applicant thereof proves that the party of the detained goods
was notified but has failed to exercise its rights within twenty (20) or
more days after the suspension of release is revoked on account of any circumstances
set forth in Items (1) through (4) of paragraph 1 of Article 66 in which
the party of the detained goods has suffered from losses owing to the suspension
of release, or after the party of the detained goods has been awarded a
favorable affirmed judgment; or
3. Where the party whose goods were detained agrees to the return of the
bond.
Under any of the following circumstances, the Customs Authority shall return the bond set forth in paragraph 4 of Article 65, upon request by the party whose goods were detained:
1. Where the bond is no longer required owing to either the
suspension of the release order has been revoked pursuant to the provisions
of Items (1) through (4) of paragraph 1 of Article 66, or the party whose
goods were detained has reached a settlement with the applicant thereof;
2. Where the party whose goods were detained proves that the applicant thereof
was notified but has failed to exercise its rights within twenty (20) or
more days after the said applicant thereof has been awarded a favorable
affirmed judgment; or
3. Where the applicant thereof agrees to the return of the bond.
Article 68
The regulations governing the application for detaining goods, revocation of a detaining, inspection of detained goods, payment, provision and return procedures for a bond or security, required documents and other matters to be abided by which set forth in the preceding three articles shall be prescribed by the competent authority and the Ministry of Finance.
Article 69
The provisions of this Chapter shall apply mutatis mutandis to infringement on the right to use a trademark granted through licensing as provided under Article 33.
Article 70
A foreign juristic person or entity, which is not limited to those recognized by the Government of the Republic of China, may also file a complaint, initiate a private prosecution, or institute a civil suit with respect to the matters prescribed in this Act.
Article 71
A court may establish a special tribunal or designate a specialist(s) to handle trademark litigation.
Chapter VIII
Certification Marks, Collective Membership Marks and Collective Trademarks
Article 72
Any person who wishes to exclusively use a mark to certify the characteristics, quality, precision, place of origin or other matters of another person's goods or services shall apply for certification mark registration.
Only a juristic person, an organization or a government agency which is capable of certifying another person's goods or services shall be eligible to apply for certification mark registration.
An applicant of the preceding paragraph who engages in business in connection with the goods or services to be certified shall not apply for certification mark registration thereof.
Article 73
The use of a certification mark shall connote that the right holder of a certification mark, in order to certify the characteristics, quality, precision, origin or other matters of another person's goods or services, agrees the said person to indicate the said certification mark on articles or documents in connection with the said goods or services.
Article 74
Any business association, social organization, or any other
group that exists as a juristic person and wishes to exclusively use a mark
to identify its organization or membership shall apply for collective membership
mark registration.
An application for collective membership mark registration of the preceding
paragraph shall be filed with the Registrar Office by submitting in writing
specifying relevant matters along with a set of articles governing the use
of the collective membership mark thereto.
Article 75
The use of a collective membership mark shall connote the indication of such mark on relevant articles or documents by the organization or its members in order to identify an organization or membership thereof.
Article 76
Any business association, social organization, or any other
group that exists as a juristic person and wishes to exclusively use a mark
to identify the goods or services provided by its members, and therefore
distinguishing these goods or services from those provided by others, may
apply for collective trademark registration.
An application for collective trademark registration of the preceding paragraph
shall be filed with the Registrar Office by submitting in writing specifying
the designated class(es) and the name(s) of goods or services along with
the a set of articles governing the use of the collective trademark thereto.
Article 77
The use of a collective trademark shall connote that, in order to identify the goods or services provided by members of an organization, the said members use the collective trademark on their goods or services whereby these goods or services may be distinguished from those provided by others.
Article 78
The right of a certification mark, a collective membership mark or a collective trademark shall not be assigned or licensed to another person for use, nor may it be the subject of a pledge. However, the aforementioned shall not apply in the case where such assignment or license to another person for use is unlikely to damage the interests of consumers, to contravene fair competition, and has been approved by the Registrar Office.
Article 79
The Registrar Office shall, upon request by any person or
ex officio, revoke the registration of a certification mark, a collective
membership mark or a collective trademark in the case where misuse of which
by the right holder or the licensed user thereof has caused damages to another
person or the public.
The term, misuse, referred to in the preceding paragraph shall connote any
of the following conditions:
1. Where a certification mark is used as a trademark or indicated on articles
or documents in connection with the goods or services provided by the right
holder of the said certification mark;
2. Where the use of a collective membership mark or collective trademark
has misled the general public regarding the nature of the organization thereof;
3. Where assignment, licensing, or creation of pledge is established in
violation of the provisions of the preceding article;
4. One that has violated the set of articles governing the use thereof;
or
5. One that is misused in other means.
Article 80
Unless otherwise provided in this Chapter, the provisions of this Act regarding trademarks shall apply mutatis mutandis to certification marks, collective membership marks or collective trademarks.
Chapter IX
PENALTY
Article 81
Any person who commits any of the following acts without prior
consent of the trademark or the collective trademark right holder thereof
shall be charged with imprisonment for no more than three years, detention
and, in addition thereto or in lieu thereof, a fine of no more than NT$200,000:
1. One who uses a mark identical to a registered trademark or collective
trademark on the same goods or services;
2. One who uses a mark identical to a registered trademark or collective
trademark on similar goods or services, and hence has caused likelihood
of confusion or misleading to relevant consumers;
3. One who uses a trademark that is similar to a registered trademark or
collective trademark on the identical or similar goods or services, and
hence has caused likelihood of confusion to relevant consumers.
Article 82
Any person, who knowingly sells, displays for sale, exports or imports the goods referred to in the preceding article, shall be charged with imprisonment of no more than one year, detention, and, in addition thereto or in lieu thereof, a fine of no more than NT$50,000.
Article 83
The goods manufactured, sold, displayed, exported or imported by, or the articles or documents in connection with provision of services by, a person committing any of the offenses as specified in the preceding two articles, shall be confiscated, regardless of whether such goods, articles or documents belong to the offender.
Chapter X
Supplementary Provisions
Article 84
The provisions of Article 26 shall not apply to a trademark or any other mark already registered prior to the enforcement of the amendment to this Act as of April 29, 2003.
Article 85
A service mark already registered prior to the enforcement
of the amendment to this Act as of April 29, 2003 shall be deemed as a trademark
as of the said date.
A service mark application yet to be registered prior to the enforcement
of the amendment to this Act as of April 29, 2003 shall be deemed as a trademark
application as of the said date.
Article 86
An associated trademark, associated service mark, associated
collective mark or associated certification mark that was already registered
prior to the enforcement of the amendment to this Act as of April 29, 2003
shall be deemed as an independent registered trademark or mark as of the
said date; its registration term shall be the same as which originally granted.
An associated trademark application, associated service mark application,
associated collective mark application or associated certification mark
application that is yet to be registered prior to the enforcement of this
Act shall be deemed as an independent trademark application or other mark
application as of April 29, 2003 on which the amendment to this Act takes
effect.
An applicant under the preceding paragraph may withdraw its application
and request for a refund before receiving the notice of approval regarding
the said application.
Article 87
A defensive trademark, defensive service mark, defensive collective
mark or defensive certification mark already registered before the enforcement
of the amendment to this Act as of April 29, 2003 shall be subject to the
provisions in force at the time of its registration, and shall be changed
to an independent registered trademark or mark before the expiration of
the term of exclusive use; the trademark right of those fail to make the
said change shall be extinguished.
A defensive trademark application, defensive service mark application, defensive
collective mark application or defensive certification mark application
yet to be registered before the enforcement of this Act shall be deemed
as an independent trademark or mark application as of April 29, 2003 on
which the amendment to this Act takes effect.
An applicant under the preceding paragraph may withdraw its application
and request for a refund before receiving the notice of approval regarding
the said application.
Article 88
With respect to a registered trademark or mark which is deemed
as an independent mark in pursuance with paragraph 1 of Article 86, the
three-year period set forth in Item (2), paragraph 1 of Article 57 shall
commence from April 29, 2003 on which the amendment to this Act takes effect.
With respect to a registered trademark or mark which has been changed to
an independent mark as provided under paragraph 1 of the preceding article,
the three-year period set forth in Item (2), paragraph 1 of Article 57 shall
commence from the date on which the said change takes place.
Article 89
Where an application for trademark registration was approved
prior to the enforcement and the said approval has not been invalidated
upon the enforcement of the amendment to this Act, the said trademark shall
be registered in pursuance with the provisions of this Act; the first installment
of the payable registration fee shall be deemed to have been paid.
Where approval of a trademark application that was cancelled prior to the
enforcement of the amendment to this Act on April 29, 2003 has been restored
as the result of administrative remedial proceedings provided under the
amendment to this Act, the said trademark shall be registered in pursuance
with the provisions of the same amendment; the first installment of the
payable registration fee shall be deemed to have been paid.
Article 90
Where opposition proceedings against a trademark were filed prior to the enforcement of the Amendment to the Trademark Act as of April 29, 2003, and are still pending after the enforcement of the Amendment, the registration of the trademark shall be cancelled only under the condition that the trademark violates both the provisions of the Trademark Act before and after the amendment. The procedure to cancel the registration shall follow the provisions of the Amendment to the Trademark Act.
Article 91
Where invalidation proceedings against a trademark were filed or requested prior to the enforcement of the Amendment to the Trademark Act as of April 29, 2003, and are still pending after the enforcement of the Amendment, the registration of the trademark shall be cancelled only under the condition that the trademark violates both the provisions of the Trademark Act before and after the amendment. The procedure to cancel the registration shall follow the provisions of the Amendment to the Trademark Act.
For a trademark, a certification mark and a collective mark registered prior to the enforcement of the Amendment to the Trademark Act as of April 29, 2003, invalidation proceedings there against may be filed upon an application or a request after the enforcement of the Amendment to the Trademark Act only under the condition that the registration violates both the provisions of the Trademark Act before and after the amendment.
Article 92
Provisions governing trademark revocation shall be applicable to trademark cancellation cases of which the decisions have not been rendered prior to the enforcement of the amendment to this Act.
Article 93
The Enforcement Rules of this Act shall be prescribed by the competent authority.
Article 94
This Act shall come into force six (6) months after the date of promulgation thereof.