|
- Should the Philippines adopt an all-out introduction of a full-scale competition law and enforcement authority?
- Exactly when is the most appropriate time to adopt competition laws, that is, does the present stage of economic development of the Philippines warrant the adoption and enforcement of anti-trust/ anti-monopoly law?
- How should the small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) under a competition policy/law regime be treated vis-a-vis large enterprises?
- Given the perceived abuses arising from the adoption of anti-dumping measures resulting in anti-competitive impact, will anti-dumping measures against the unfair trade act of dumping be replaced by competition laws?
- The relationship between intellectual property rights and competition laws
- IPR generally grant monopoly rights; competition laws prohibit monopolistic conduct and business restrictions in principles.
- Extraterritorial application of competition laws
- although a degree of extraterritorial jurisdiction is inevitable in the face of today's transnationalized business activities, it may cause a conflict with sovereignty and policies of other nations.
- Harmonization of competition law
- In the era of globalizing economies and business transactions, there will be a strong need for harmonizing competition policies and laws of the world. There will be a variety of attempts including bilateral, plurilateral and multilateral negotiations and, in the long run, there may be a more harmonized competition law system.
- With a competition regime in place, will RP's national interest be better served or be exposed to the onslaught of multinational companies from developed economies?
| |