List of Legal Measures in FY2002
|
No. |
Case number. |
Case Name |
Description |
Violated Article |
Date of Recommendation ¡]Date of Decision¡^ |
|
1
|
2002 (R¡^ 1
|
Case against K.K. Wakasuzu and 32 others
|
Section 3 (Unreasonable restraint of trade) |
April 14, 2002 (May 29, 2002) |
|
|
2 |
2002 (R) 2 |
Case against K.K. Takahashi Doken and 16¡@others |
They colluded to prearrange the winner of the competitive bids for civil engineering works (A class) invited by Kawagoe-city designating ones with an office in the City |
Section 3 (Unreasonable restraint of trade) |
April 26, 2002 (May 14, 2002) |
|
3 |
2002 (R) 3 |
Case against Hatsukari Kogyo K.K. and 14 others |
Section 3 (Unreasonable restraint of trade) |
April 14, 2002 (May 31, 2002) |
|
|
4 |
2002 (R) 4 |
Case against Raito Kogyo K.K. and 26 others |
Section 3 (Unreasonable restraint of trade) |
May 16, 2002 ¡]June 17, 2002¡^ |
|
|
5 |
2002 (R) 5 |
Case against Otsubo Kensetsu K.K. and 22 others |
Section 3 (Unreasonable restraint of trade) |
June 10, 2002 ¡]June 28, 2002¡^ |
|
|
6 |
2002 (R) 6 |
Case against Penta-Ocean Construction Co., Ltd. and 4 others |
Section 3 (Unreasonable restraint of trade) |
June 10, 2002 (June 28, 2002) |
|
|
|
2002 (R) 7 |
Case against Mitsubishi Electric Building Techno-Service Co., Ltd. |
The company (conducting maintenance business of Mitsubishi brand elevators ) hinders maintenance contract between independent maintenance companies which handle Mitsubishi elevators and owners of Mitsubishi elevators and smooth operation of their work by: 1. selling maintenance parts to the companies with term of producing in spite of having the parts ready to serve. |
Section 19(General Designation Item 15) |
June 11, 2002 ¡]July 26, 2002¡^ |
|
8
|
2002 (R) 8 |
Case against Nisseki Ryoyu Engineering and Construction Co., Ltd. and 6 others |
They colluded to prearrange the winner of the bids for maintenance works which National Petroleum Reserve Company procured nominating some of the 7 companies that received the recommendation. |
Section 3 (Unreasonable restraint of trade) |
June 24, 2002 (July 26 2002)
|
|
9
|
2002 (R) 9 |
Case against Shingokizai K.K. and other 55 others |
They colluded to prearrange the winner of the designated competitive bids etc. for placement works of road signs etc, invited by Tokyo Metropolitan Police under the agreement that two chief companies determine the winner taking into account past records for participation in and winning of the bids. |
Section 3 (Unreasonable restraint of trade) |
July 15, 2002 ¡]July 30, 2002¡^ |
|
10 |
2002 (R) 10 |
Case against Shingokizai K.K. and other 48 others |
They colluded to prearrange the winner of the designated quotation adjusting for painting works of road signs invited by Tokyo Metropolitan Police, under the agreement that three chief companies determine the winner taking into account past records for participation in and winning of the bids.
|
Section 3 (Unreasonable restraint of trade) |
July 15, 2002 ¡]July 30, 2002¡^ |
|
1 |
200 (R) 11
|
Case against Miyagawa Kogyo Co., Ltd. and 55 others |
Section 3 (Unreasonable restraint of trade) |
July 15, 2002 ¡]July 30, 2002¡^ |
|
|
12 |
2002 (R) 12 |
Case against K.K. Kinki Sanki and 8 others |
They colluded to prearrange the winner of the bids etc. for liquid oxygen for tank preservation invited by national hospitals etc. in Osaka Prefecture |
Section 3 (Unreasonable restraint of trade) |
July 15, 2002 ¡]July 30, 2002¡^ |
|
13 |
2002 (R) 13 |
Case against K.K. Mizushima Sanso Shokai and 4 others |
They colluded to prearrange the winner of the bids for liquid oxygen for tank reservation invited by national hospitals etc. in Hyogo Prefecture. |
Section 3 (Unreasonable restraint of trade) |
July 15, 2002 ¡]July 30, 2002¡^ |
|
14 |
2002 (R) 14 |
Case against Takii Seed Co., Ltd. and 31 others |
They sold the seed of Chinese cabbage, cabbage, radish and turnip jointly determining the standard selling prices
|
Section 3 (Unreasonable restraint of trade) |
August 26, 2002 ¡]September 25, 2002¡^
|
|
15
|
2002 (R) 15
|
Case against Kakimoto Denki K.K. and 9 others |
They colluded to prearrange the winner of the designated competitive bids invited by the Education Board of Osaka-City for language exercise machines. |
Section 3 (Unreasonable restraint of trade) |
September 12, 2002 (October 9, 2002) |
|
16 |
2002 (R) 16 |
Case against K.K. Kyoeisha and 22 others |
They colluded to prearrange the winner of the designated competitive bids for computers invited by the Education Board of Osaka-city. |
Section 3 (Unreasonable restraint of trade) |
September 12, 2002 (October 9, 2002) |
|
17
|
2002 (R) 17 |
Case against K.K. Takada Doboku and 118 others |
They colluded to prearrange the winner of the designated competitive bids for civil engineering works invited by Chiba-city etc. nominating the companies with the headquarter or major office in the City |
Section 3 (Unreasonable restraint of trade) |
October 30, 2002 ¡]December 4, 2002¡^ ¡]January 8, 2003¡^
|
|
18
|
2002 (R) 18 |
Case against Asahi Kensetsu K.K. and 97 others |
They colluded to prearrange the winner of the designated competitive bids for paving works invited by Chiba-city etc. nominating the companies with the headquarter in the City. |
Section 3 (Unreasonable restraint of trade) |
October 30, 2002 ¡]December 4, 2002¡^ ¡]January 8, 2003¡^ |
|
19 |
2002 (R) 19 |
Case against Shikoku Road Service K.K. and 3 others |
They colluded to predetermine Shikoku Road Service K.K. as the winner of the open-type designated competitive bids for road maintenance works invited by Shikoku Branch of the Japan Highway Public Corporation. |
Section 3 (Unreasonable restraint of trade) |
November 12, 2002 ¡]December 4, 2002¡^
|
|
20 |
2002 (R) 20 |
Case against Scubapro Asia K.K. |
The company, itself or through its wholesalers, without proper justification makes retailers sell new and popular diving equipments at prices which are higher or the same as the price the company designated. |
Section 19(General Designation Item 12 (i),(ii) |
November 28,2002 ¡]December 26, 2002¡^ |
|
21
|
2002 (R) 21 |
Case against Uchida Yoko Co., Ltd. and 4 others |
The manufactures jointly decided that the manufacture whose name is written in the specification sell science goods for schools which local governments in western Japan procures. |
Section 3 (Unreasonable restraint of trade) |
November 29, 2002 ¡]December 26, 2002¡^ |
|
22 |
2002 (R) 22 |
Case against K.K. Nozawa and 1 other |
The manufactures of cement boards colluded to raise the price of extrusion cement boards to retailing builders. |
Section 3 (Unreasonable restraint of trade) |
December 5, 2002 (January 8, 2003) |
|
23 |
2002 (R) 23 |
Case against Tokyo ALC Cooperatives |
They unjustly hinder non-members in selling activities for works for light foaming concrete materials in and around Tokyo by making them apply for the work through a member and giving it the works only when the cooperative assign the right. |
Section 19(General Designation Item 15) |
December 26 2002 (January 31, 2003) |
|
24 |
2003 (R) 1 |
Case against Oikawa Sangyo¡@K.K. and 45 others |
They colluded to prearrange the winner of the designated competitive bids for civil engineering and gardening works invited by Iwamizawa-city. |
Section 3 (Unreasonable restraint of trade) |
January 30, 2003 (March 11, 2003) |
|
25 |
2003 (R) 2 |
Case against K.K. Katsui and 41others |
They colluded to prearrange the winner of the designated competitive bids for construction works invited by Iwamizawa-city. |
Section 3 (Unreasonable restraint of trade) |
January 30, 2003 (March 11, 2003) |
|
26 |
2003 (R) 3 |
Case against Doo Kosan K.K. and 16 others |
They colluded to prearrange the winner of the designated competitive bids for piping works invited by Iwamizawa-city. |
Section 3 (Unreasonable restraint of trade) |
January 30, 2003 (March 11, 2003) |
|
27 |
2003 (R) 4 |
Case against Hokuritsu Hodo¡@K.K. and 15 others |
They colluded to prearrange the winner of the designated competitive bids for paving works invited by Iwamizawa-city. |
Section 3 (Unreasonable restraint of trade) |
January 30, 2003 (March 11, 2003) |
|
28 |
2003 (R) 5 |
Case against Chiba Denki Koji K.K and 16 others |
They colluded to prearrange the winner of the designated competitive bids for electrical works invited by Iwamizawa-city. |
Section 3 (Unreasonable restraint of trade) |
January 30, 2003 (March 11, 2003) |
|
29 |
2003 (R) 6 |
Case against SRL, Inc. and 5 others |
The clinical laboratory companies colluded to prearrange the winner of the competitive bids for clinical laboratory test invited by national hospitals etc. in Tokyo Metropolis. |
Section 3 (Unreasonable restraint of trade) |
February 13, 2003 (March 14, 2003) ¡]ª`3¡^ |
|
30 |
2003 (R) 7 |
Case against SRL, Inc. and 8 others |
The clinical laboratory companies colluded to prearrange the winner of the competitive bids for clinical laboratory test invited by national and public hospitals in Nagoya area. |
Section 3 (Unreasonable restraint of trade) |
February 13, 2003 (March 14, 2003)
|
|
31 |
2003 (R) 8 |
Case against SRL, Inc. and 7 others |
Section 3 (Unreasonable restraint of trade) |
February 13, 2003 (March 14, 2003)
|
|
|
32 |
2003 (R) 9 |
Case against SRL, Inc. and 4 others |
The clinical laboratory companies colluded to prearrange the winner of the competitive bids for clinical laboratory test invited by national hospitals in Fukuoka area. |
Section 3 (Unreasonable restraint of trade) |
February 13, 2003 (March 14, 2003)
|
|
33 |
2003 (R) 10 |
Case against Sumitomo Electric Industries, Ltd. and 5 others |
They colluded to prearrange the winner of the designated competitive bids for placing works of integrated control type traffic signals invited by Tokyo Metropolitan Police Department |
Section 3 (Unreasonable restraint of trade) |
February 20, 2003 (March 28, 2003)
|
|
34 |
2003 (R) 11 |
Case against K.K. Kyosan Seisakusho and 13 others |
They colluded to prearrange the winner of the designated competitive bids for placement works of multistage- programmed traffic signals invited by Tokyo Metropolitan Police¡@Department. |
Section 3 (Unreasonable restraint of trade) |
February 20, 2003 (March 28, 2003)
|
|
35 |
2003 (R) 12 |
Case against K.K. Kyosan Seisakusho and 7 others |
They colluded to prearrange the winner of the designated competitive bids for works on sensor system for the traffic-weak¡@invited by Tokyo Metropolitan Police Department. |
Section 3 (Unreasonable restraint of trade) |
February 20, 2003 (March 28, 2003)
|
|
36
|
2003 (R) 13 |
Case against Sankyu Denki K.K. and 13 others |
They colluded to prearrange the winner of the designated competitive bids for renewal works of traffic signals invited by Tokyo Metropolitan Police Department. |
Section 3 (Unreasonable restraint of trade) |
February 20, 2003 (March 28, 2003)
|
|
37 |
2003 (R) 14 |
Case against the Japan Hospital Food Wholesale Cooperative |
The Cooperative restricted members¡¦ selling area of the therapeutic foods which were supplied from the Cooperative or supporting members |
Section 8 (1)iv |
March 14, 2003 ¡]April 9, 2003¡^ |
A part of the firms subject to legal measures did not accept the recommendations, and these firms are under hearing procedures.