AGREEMENT
BETWEEN THE GOVERNMENT OF
CANADA
AND
THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES
REGARDING THE APPLICATION OF
THEIR COMPETITION LAWS
THE GOVERNMENT OF
CANADA ("Canada") of the one part and THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITY AND THE
EUROPEAN COAL AND STEEL COMMUNITY ("the European Communities") of the
other part ("the Parties"):
Considering the
close economic relations between them;
Recognising that
the world's economies, including those of the Parties, are becoming
increasingly interrelated;
Noting that the
Parties share the view that the sound and effective enforcement of competition
law is a matter of importance to the efficient operation of their respective
markets and to trade between them;
Acknowledging
their commitment to enhancing the sound and effective enforcement of their
competition laws through cooperation and, in appropriate cases, coordination
between them in the application of those laws;
Noting that
coordination of their enforcement activities may, in certain cases, result in a
more effective resolution of the Parties' respective competition concerns than
would be attained through 'independent enforcement action by the Parties;
Acknowledging the
Parties' commitment to giving careful consideration to each other's important
interests in the application of their competition laws and to using their best
efforts to arrive at an accommodation of those interests;
Having regard to
the Recommendation of the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and
Development
Concerning Cooperation Between Member Countries on Restrictive Business
Practices
Affecting International Trade, adopted on 27 and 28 July 1995; and
Having regard to
the Economic Cooperation Agreement between Canada and the European
Communities adopted on 6 July 1976,@ to the. Declaration On European Community-Canada Relations adopted
on 22 November 1990 and to the Joint Political Declaration Relations and its
accompanying Action Plan adopted on December 17, 1996;
HAVE AGREED AS
FOLLOWS:
I. PURPOSE AND
DEFINITIONS
1.The purpose of
this Agreement is to promote cooperation and coordination between the
competition authorities of the Parties and to lessen the possibility or impact
of differences between the Parties in the application of their competition
laws.
2.In this
Agreement,
anti-competitive
activities" shall mean any conduct or transaction that may be subject to
penalties or other relief under the competition laws of a Party;
"competent
authority of a Member State" shall mean that authority of a Member State
set out in Annex A. Annex A may be added to or modified at any time by the
European Communities. Canada will
be notified in writing of such additions or modifications before any
information is sent to a newly listed authority.
"competition
authority" and "competition authorities" shall mean:
(i) for Canada, the
Commissioner of Competition appointed under the Competition Act, and
(ii) for the European Communities,
the Commission of the European Communities, as to its responsibilities pursuant
to the competition laws of the European Communities;
“competition law
or laws" shall mean:
(i) for Canada, the
Competition Act and regulations thereunder, and
(ii) for the European Communities,
Articles 85, 86, and 89 of the Treaty establishing the European Community,
Council Regulation (EEC) No 4064/89 on the control of concentrations between
undertakings, Articles 65 and 66 of the Treaty establishing the European Coal
and Steel Community (ECSC), and their implementing Regulation pursuant to the
said Treaties including High Authority Decision No 24-54, as well as any
amendments thereto and such other laws or regulations as the parties, may
jointly agree in writing to be a “competition law" for the purposes of
this Agreement; and
"enforcement
activity" shall mean any application of competition law by way of investigation
or proceeding conducted by the competition authority of a Party.
3.Any reference
in this Agreement to a specific provision in either Party's competition law
shall be interpreted as referring to that provision as amended from time to
time and to any successor provisions.
II. NOTIFICATION
1 . Each Party shall notify the other Party
in the manner provided by this Article and Article IX with respect to its
enforcement activities that may affect important interests of the other Party.
2., Enforcement
activities that may affect the important interests of the other Party and
therefore ordinarily give rise to notifiable circumstances include those that:
(i) are relevant to
enforcement activities of the other Party;
(ii) involve anti-competitive activities,
other than mergers or acquisitions, carried out Wholly or in part in the
territory of the other Party;
(iii) involve conduct believed to have
been required, encouraged or approved by the other Party or one of its
provinces or Member States;;
(iv) involve a merger or
acquisition in which:
- one or more of
the parties to the transaction; or
- a company
controlling one or more of the parties to the transaction;
is a company
incorporated or organised under the laws of the other Party or one of its
provinces or Member States;
(v) involve the imposition
of, or application for, remedies by a competition authority that would require
or prohibit conduct in the territory of the other Party; or
(vi) involve one of the Parties
seeking information located in the territory of the other Party.
3.Notification
pursuant to this Article shall ordinarily be given as soon as a competition
authority becomes aware that notifiable circumstances are present, and in any
event, in accordance with paragraphs 4 through 7 of this Article.
4.Where
notifiable circumstances are present with respect to mergers or acquisitions,
notification shall be given;
(a) in the case of the
European Communities, when a notice is published in the Qfficial Journal,
pursuant to Article 4(3) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 4064/89, or when notice
of the transaction is received under Article 66 of the ECSC Treaty and a prior
authorisation from the Commission is required under that provision; and
(b) in the case of Canada,
not later than when its competition authority issues a written request for
information under oath or affirmation, or obtains an order under section 11 of
the Competition Act, with respect to the transaction.
5. (a) When the competition authority of a Party
requests that a person provide information, documents or other records located
in the territory of the other Party, or requests oral testimony in a proceeding
or participation in a personal interview by a person located: in the territory
of the other Party, notification shall be given at or before the time that the
request is made.
(b) Notification
pursuant to subparagraph (a) of this paragraph is required notwithstanding that
the enforcement activity in relation to which the said information is sought
has previously been notified pursuant to Article II paragraphs 1 to 3. However,
separate notification is not required for each subsequent request for
information from the same person made in the course of such-enforcement
activity unless the notified Party indicates otherwise or unless the Party
seeking information becomes aware of new issues bearing upon the important
interests of the notified Party.
6.Where
notifiable circumstances are present, notification shall also be given far
enough in advance of each of the following events to enable the other Party's
views to be considered:
(a) in the case of the
European Communities,
(i) when its
competition authority decides to initiate proceedings with respect to the
concentration, pursuant to Article 6(l)(c) of Council Regulation (EEC) No
4064/89;
(ii) in cases other than mergers
and acquisitions, the.issuance of a statement of objections; or
(iii) the adoption of a
decision or settlement,
(b) in the case of Canada,
(i) the filing of an application with the
Competition Tribunal;
(ii) the initiation of criminal proceedings;
or
(iii) the
settlement of a matter by way of undertaking or consent order.
7. (a) Each Party
shall also notify the other whenever its competition authority intervenes or
otherwise participates in a regulatory or judicial proceeding, if the issues
addressed in the intervention or participation may affect the other Party's
important interests.
Notification
under this paragraph shall apply only to:
(i) regulatory
or judicial proceedings that are public; and
(ii) intervention or participation that is public
and pursuant to formal procedures.
(b) Notification shall be
made at the time of the intervention or participation or as soon there-after as
possible.
8. Notifications
shall be sufficiently detailed to enable the notified Party to make an initial.
evaluation of the effects of the enforcement activity on its own important
interests. Notifications shall
include the names and addresses of the natural and legal persons involved he
nature of the activities under investigation and the legal provisions
concerned.
9. Notifications made pursuant to this Article shall be communicated in accordance with Article IX.
III. CONSULTATIONS
1. Either Party
may request consultations regarding any matter relating to this Agreement. The request for consultations shall
indicate the reasons for the request and whether any procedural time limits or
other constraints require that consultations be expedited. Each Party
undertakes to consult promptly when so requested with the view to reaching a
conclusion that is consistent with the principles set forth in this Agreement.
2. During
consultations under paragraph 1, the competition authority of each Party shall
carefully consider the representations of the other Party in light of the
principles set out in this Agreement and shall be prepared to explain to the
other Party the-specific results of its application of those principles to the
matter under discussion.
IV. COORDINATION
OF ENFORCEMENT ACTIVITIES
1. The
competition authority of each Party shall render assistance to the competition
authority of the other Party in its enforcement activities to the extent
compatible with the assisting Party's laws and important interests.
2. In bases where
both Parties competition authorities have an interest in pursuing enforcement
activities with regard to related situations, the y may agree that it is in
their m utual interest to coordinate their enforcement activities. In considering whether particular
enforcement activities should be coordinated, either in whole or in part, each
Party's competition authority shall take into account the following factors,
among others:
(i) the effect of such
coordination on the ability of each Party's competition authority to achieve
the objectives of its enforcement activities;
(ii) the relative ability of each
Party's competition authority to obtain information necessary to conduct the
enforcement activities;
(iii) the extent to which either Party's
competition authority can secure effective preliminary or permanent relief
against the anti-competitive activities involved;
(iv) the opportunity to make more
efficient use of resources; and
(v)
the possible reduction of cost to persons subject to enforcement
activities.
3. (a) The Parties competition authorities may coordinate their enforcement activities by agreeing upon the timing of those activities in a particular matter, while respecting fully their own laws and important interests. Such coordination may, as agreed by the Parties competition authorities, result in enforcement action by one or both Parties competition, authorities, as is best suited to attain their objectives.
(b) When
carrying out coordinated enforcement activity, each Party's competition
authority shall seek to maximise the likelihood that the other Party's
enforcement objectives will, also be achieved.
(c) Either
Party may at any time notify the other Party that it intends to limit or
terminate the coordination and pursue its enforcement activities independently
and subject to the .other provisions of this Agreement.
V. COOPERATION
REGARDING
ANTI-COMPETITIVE ACTIVITIES IN THE TERRITORY OF ONE PARTY THAT ADVERSELY AFFECT THE INTERESTS OF THE OTHER PARTY
1. The Parties
note that anti-competitive activities may occur within the territory of one
Party that, in addition to violating that Party's competition laws, adversely
affect important interests of the other Party. The Parties agree that it is in
both their interests to address anticompetitive activities, of this nature.
2. If a Party has
reason to believe that anti-competitive activities carried out in the territory
of the other Party are adversely affe6ting, or may adversely affect the first
Party's important interests, the first Party may request that the other Party's
competition authority initiate appropriate enforcement activities. The request shall be as specific as
possible about the nature of the anticompetitive activities and their effects
on the interests of the requesting Party, and shall include an offer of such
further information and other cooperation as the requesting Party's competition
authority is able to provide.
3. The requested
Part shall consult with the requesting Party and the requested Party's
competition authority shall accord full and sympathetic consideration to the
request in deciding whether or not to initiate, or expand, enforcement
activities with respect to the anti-competitive activities identified in the
request. The requested Party's
competition authority shall promptly inform the other Party of its decision and
the reasons for that decision. If
enforcement activities are initiated, the requested Party's competition
authority shall advise the requesting 'Party of significant developments and
the outcome of the enforcement activities.
4. Nothing in this Article limits the discretion of the requested
Party's competition authority under its competition laws and enforcement
policies as to whether or not to undertake enforcement activities with respect
to the anti-competitive activities identified in the request, or precludes the
requesting Party's competition authority from undertaking enforcement
activities with respect to such anti-competitive activities.
VI. AVOIDANCE OF
CONFLICT
1. Within the
framework of its own laws and to the extent compatible with its important
interests, each Party shall, having regard to the purpose of this Agreement as
set out in Article 1, give careful consideration to the other Party's important
interests throughout all phases of competition enforcement activities,
including decisions regarding the initiation of an investigation or.
proceeding, the scope of an investigation or proceeding and the nature of the
remedies or penalties sought in each case.
2. Where it
appears that one Party's enforcement activities may adversely affect the
important interests of the other Party, each Party shall, consistent with the
general principles set out above, use its best efforts to, arrive at an
appropriate accommodation of the Parties competing interests and in doing so
each Party shall consider all relevant factors, including:
(i) the relative
significance to the anti-competitive activities involved of conduct occurring,
within one Party's territory as compared to conduct occurring within that of
the other;
(ii) the relative significance and
foreseeability of the effects of the anti-competitive 8ictivities on one
Party's important interests as compared to the effects on the other Party's
important interests;
(iii) the presence or absence of a
purpose on the part of those engaged in the anticompetitive activities to
affect 'consumers, suppliers or competitors within the enforcing Party's
territory;
(iv) the degree of conflict or
consistency between the enforcement activities and the other Party’s laws or
articulated economic policies including those expressed in the application of
or decisions under, their respective competition laws;
(v) whether private
persons, either natural or legal, will be placed under conflicting requirements
by both Parties,
(vi) the existence or absence of
reasonable expectations that would be furthered or defeated by the enforcement
activities;
(vii) the location of relevant assets;
(viii) the degree to which a remedy,
in order to be effective, must be carried out within the other Party's
territory,
(ix) the need to minimise the negative
effects on the other Party's important interests, in particular when
implementing remedies to address anti-competitive effects Within the Party's
territory; and
(x) the extent to which
enforcement activities of the other Party with respect to the same persons,
including judgments or undertakings resulting from such activities, would be
affected.
VII. EXCHANGE'OF INFORMATION
1.In furtherance
of the principles set forth in this Agreement, the Parties agree that it is in
their common interest to share information which will facilitate the effective
application of -their respective competition laws and promote better
understanding of each others enforcement policies and activities.
2.Each Party
agrees to provide to the other Party upon request such information within its
possession as the requesting Party may describe that is relevant to an
enforcement activity that is being contemplated or conducted by the requesting
Party's competition authority.
3. In the case of concurrent action by the competition authorities of
both Parties with a view to the application of their competition law, the
competition authority of each Party shall, upon request by the competition
authority of the other Party, ascertain whether the natural or legal persons
concerned will consent to the sharing of confidential information related
thereto between the Parties competition authorities.
4.
DuringconsultationspursuanttoArticleill,eachPartyshallprovidetheotherwithasmuch
information as it is able in order to facilitate the broadest possible
discussion regarding the relevant aspects of a particular transaction.
VIII. SEMI-ANNUAL'MEETINGS
1. In furtherance of their
common interest in cooperation and coordination in relation to their
enforcement activities, appropriate officials of the Parties competition
authorities shall meet twice a year, or otherwise as agreed between the
competition authorities of the Parties, to: (a) exchange information on their
current enforcement activities and priorities (b) exchange information on
economic sectors of common interest, (c) discuss policy changes which they are
considering, and (d) discuss other matters of mutual interest relating to the
application of competition laws.
2. A report on these semi-annual meetings shall be made available to
the Joint Cooperation Committee under the Framework Agreement for Commercial
and Economic Cooperation between the European Communities and Canada.
IX.
COMMUNICATIONS UNDER THIS AGREEMENT
Communications
under this Agreement, including notifications under Article 11 and requests
under Articles Ill and V, may be carried out by direct oral, telephonic or
facsimile communication between the competition authorities of the
Parties. Notifications under
Article 11 and requests under Articles 111@ and V, however, shall be confirmed
promptly in writing through normal diplomatic channels.
X.
CONFIDENTIALITY AND USE OF INFORMATION
1. Notwithstandin
any other, provision of this Agreement, neither Party is required to disclose
information to the other Party where such disclosure is prohibited by the laws
of the Party possessing the information or would be incompatible with that
Party's important interests.
2. Unless
otherwise agreed by the Parties, each Party shall, to the fullest extent
possible, maintain the confidentiality of an information communicated to it in
confidence by the other Party under this Agreement. Each Party shall oppose, to the fullest extent possible, any
application by a third party for disclosure of such information.
3. (a) The competition authority of the European Communities, after notice to the Canadian competition authority, will inform the competent authorities of the Member State or Member States whose important interests are affected of the notifications sent to it by ,the Canadian competition authority.
(b) The competition authority of the European Communities, after consultation with the Canadian competition authority, will inform the competent authorities of such Member State or Member States of any cooperation and coordination of enforcement activities. However, as regards such activities, the competition authority of the European Communities will respect the Canadian competition authority's request not to disclose the information which it provides when necessary to ensure confidentiality.
4. Before taking
any action which may result in a legal obligation to make available to a third
party information provided in confidence under this Agreement the Parties
competition authorities shall consult one another and give due consideration to
their respective important interests.
5. Information
received by a Party under this Agreement, apart from information received under
Article 11, shall only be used for the purpose of enforcing that Party's
competition laws. Information
received under Article II shall only be used for the purpose of this Agreement.
6. A Party may require that information furnished, pursuant to this
Agreement be used subject to the terms and conditions it may specify. The receiving Party shall not use such
information in a manner contrary to such terms and conditions without the prior
consent of the other Party.